“I like him better already.”
Yeah.
I said before that if it weren’t Paul’s treacherous words like, “the Senate didn’t declare war on Iraq,” when clearly the Senate did declare war on Iraq, then I would have no problem with Paul.
Just because the wording of the “Joint Resolution to authorize military force in Iraq” wasn’t worded to Paul’s liking “DAAAAh, WE SENATORS DECLARE WAR!” doesn’t make it unconstitutional. Paul is too nutty.
This goes to prove how absolutely retarded the left is, the lazy bums didn’t spend 15 minutes to go online and look at Paul’s voting record. The left has had months to do that. Maybe they have a literacy problem over on the left. Its hillarious, it will be even more hillarious to watch Paul’s numbers go down as the leftist primary raiders re-register as Democrat.
I could not vote for Paul unless he was the only candidate available. No way, but this article did make him sound good. :D
I agree with you!
Yes, strict constitutionists are funny about exact wording, that is why we are so inflexiable when it comes to the Bill of Rights.
But since, in your view a war was declared against Iraq, I suppose we won it since Sadam is dead and his government has been overthrown.
So the war is over then?