Still waiting. IN DETAIL tell us, what in particular would Paul do, and how would he do it. Screaming slogans like "He will abolish the IRS", "He will end the WAR" does not answer the question.
Picking a Presidential Candidate is a serious business, not a popularity contest. Takes more then mouthing some slogans and slamming everything and everyone else to be qualified for the Presidency.
Paul fails in the basic qualifications for President in a whole lot of ways. Perhaps most importantly his complete inability to understand how a President is required to defend the USA.
Look at his drivel about a "tradition, non Interventionist Foreign Policy" The USA has NEVER had any such thing. The Founders fought an Undeclared Naval War with France and fought the Barbary Pirates. During the 1920s and 30s, at the height of the Isolationist movement, we fount a number of banana wars in Caribbean and Central American.
Defending the US does not start and stop at the US border. It never has. No matter how relentless the Paulbots try to ignore reality, the world is a much more interdependent place then it was in 1792.
There are any number of regions the US cannot afford to fall under the sway for hostile powers. The free flow of oil from the ME is a vital US economic, thus a vital National Security, issue.
Yanking the troops our of the ME so that the whole region falls under the influence of China, via their proxy Iran, would be an a gross dereliction of the President's oath to defend the USA.
That Paul advocates exactly that course of action indicates his complete unfitness to be President.
You keep chirping that same old mantra time and time again when you have been given a link to over 900 speech's and articles outlining his positions. That is more information in the public domain on Ron Paul's views then all the information on the rest of the candidates combined.
I suspect that it is not information about Paul's policies that you seek however. I suspect that you hope that through enough repetitive inane posts as the one I referenced by you are intended to posit an inaccurate picture of a candidate whose political ideas are "pie in the sky".
Would you have me start posting the 900 articles and speech's that answer your question one at a time?