Skip to comments.
Ron Paul: Utah turnout wows candidate
Salt Lake Tribune ^
| 9/16/07
| Sheena McFarland
Posted on 09/16/2007 6:05:18 AM PDT by George W. Bush
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Fun account of a surprisingly large Utah rally. The brunch fundraiser didn't raise nearly as much as the L.A. and S.F. fundraisers this weekend, maybe we'll hear later how well the dinner fundraiser went.
To: DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...
 |

  
 Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 • |
     
|
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave |
Utah ping!
To: George W. Bush
Anti Paul people are scared. Scared that their favorite RINO'S liberal records on everything from abortion to immigration to gun control will really get out, and their fake persona's that have about 30 percent of conservatives fooled, will be revealed.
3
posted on
09/16/2007 6:09:32 AM PDT
by
Rush4U
To: Rush4U
Scared?
Its statements like that make RP supporters seem nuts (to put it bluntly). It appears there can be no conversation about his policies and why someone may or may not like him as a candidate for president.
I can not support a man who has such disregard for a stern/forceful forgein policy. I can not support a candidate that does not support Israel.
I can not support a candidate who blames US for 9/11.
4
posted on
09/16/2007 6:16:19 AM PDT
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: Rush4U
Although his domestic policies may look very good, I cannot support someone that wants an isolationist foreign policy.
I support the war in Iraq and strongly believe that the troops should not come home after Iraq and Afghanistan. The war on terror continues and could take a generation or more.
I support Isarael and Taiwan.
I thought giving away the Panama Canal was foolish, especially since we build it, paid for it 3 times (France, Columbia, and Panama), and then paid rent on it.
I think building multinational Pacific military alliances with Japan, Australia, India, and Singapore is smart. I think building the same type of alliances with Eastern Europe is smart.
I would rather have the US as a world empire than China or Russia.
5
posted on
09/16/2007 6:25:39 AM PDT
by
Tai_Chung
To: svcw
A few large nicer photos from SLC.
As so often, you can't help but notice all the young people attracted to Ron Paul's message.
To: George W. Bush
7
posted on
09/16/2007 6:30:56 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: Tai_Chung
I would rather have the US as a world empire than China or Russia.
If you desire an American empire or for America to be a nation-building global policeman, then Ron Paul certainly is not your candidate. LOL.
Amazes me what people say on these threads.
To: Rush4U
"Anti Paul people are scared" Paulistinians are wacked out. This statement typifies it.
9
posted on
09/16/2007 6:33:02 AM PDT
by
lormand
(Ron Paul - Surrender/Suicide Monkey for GOP nominee.)
To: George W. Bush
That maybe true but does not answer why he blames the US for 9/11 and why he has such a negative position on strong nation defense. Both of which are my primary objections to him as president.
10
posted on
09/16/2007 6:33:11 AM PDT
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: George W. Bush
11
posted on
09/16/2007 6:34:33 AM PDT
by
lormand
(Ron Paul - Surrender/Suicide Monkey for GOP nominee.)
To: George W. Bush
And I am always amazed why you can not defend his position on weak defense of this nation.
12
posted on
09/16/2007 6:34:36 AM PDT
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: lormand

"HAHAHAHAHA! 'Dead or alive' Bush said! HAHAHAHAHA! But seriously, don't vote for Ron Paul. He's a candidate that does more than talk. Vote for Giuliani or any democrat...please?"
13
posted on
09/16/2007 6:38:32 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: NapkinUser; Admin Moderator; traviskicks
Sorry, Admin, I didn't even check for an existing thread. Probably one of them should be pulled.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1897298/posts
traviskicks and NapkinUser, you might consider posting some of these articles in the RLC Forum. Articles in major papers or mags or websites may be suited for FR's main sidebars (Extended, etc.) but we should consider putting most of our Ron Paul threads in the RLC Forum so that we have a ready list of articles there. Many days, we've had almost nothing posted in RLC Forum.
To: George W. Bush

"As so often, you can't help but notice all the young people stinking hippies and liberals attracted to Ron Paul's message."
I fixed it for you.
15
posted on
09/16/2007 6:39:17 AM PDT
by
lormand
(Ron Paul - Surrender/Suicide Monkey for GOP nominee.)
To: Rush4U
We (the anti-Pauls) are sitting out here laughing at you and you think we are scared? Don’t you see the humor in that?
Paul is NOT going to win the nomination. He is an embarrassment and you are making a laughing stock out of yourself with statements like that.
16
posted on
09/16/2007 6:42:02 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: svcw; lormand
I never said I support Ron Paul for President, but he has been consistently conservative on many issues (unlike RudyMcRomny's recent extreme make over(s) ).
17
posted on
09/16/2007 6:42:29 AM PDT
by
Rush4U
To: George W. Bush
If we pulled our troops out of the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere I have no doubt the United States would be at much greater risk of attack and the next war front would be on the US boarder. We would have no military allies because Ron Paul doesn’t believe in them. He would not even help England or Australia.
The foreign policy disaster would exceed even that of Jimmy Carter.
To: Tai_Chung
Ron Paul foreign policy: U.S. out of UN.
Good enough for me.
19
posted on
09/16/2007 6:46:33 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
To: Tai_Chung
If we pulled our troops out of the Middle East, Europe, Asia, and elsewhere I have no doubt the United States would be at much greater risk of attack and the next war front would be on the US boarder. We would have no military allies because Ron Paul doesnt believe in them. He would not even help England or Australia.
He does believe in allies. I don't know why Paul-haters have to make this stuff up. It's like a competition to see who can spew the biggest lies about him.
Anyway, the globalists on FR can hate him as much as they want. And if RP is our nominee, you can always vote for Hitlery. The Xlintons love that global empire and world policeman stuff.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson