Replies

You are talking about that candidate, paulnut?

Careful there sunshine. About this time next year your lot is going to be running around in a circle as the rest of the Presidential candidates adopt Rep. Paul's current position on the police action.

But I do thank you for name calling....gee who's being 'rude' and 'snotty' here? I wonder if I should ping the person who claimed all Paul supporters were such and point out the name calling from those that would slur the one candidate who stands by the Constitution...

52 posted on 07/20/2007 5:36:41 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)

Long before this time next year Iraq will be stabilized and most likely some troops will be coming home with a victory and not a surrender to al Qaeda like Paul wants and all you paulnuts hope and pray for.

Just like some freepers like to call GW supporters, like myself, Bushbots, Thompson supporters Fredheads, I choose to call Paul supports Paulnuts because Paul is nutty and after all he is the choice of "wackos" as the article says. Feel free to ping all your fellow paulnuts, all five of them.

58 posted on 07/20/2007 5:42:54 PM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)

“I wonder if I should ping the person who claimed all Paul supporters were such”

No need. And I thought I had revised and extended my remarks to say that of the Paul supports I HAD TALKED TO OR READ the MAJORITY (not all) were foul-mouthed jerks.

Not ALL.

136 posted on 07/20/2007 7:27:12 PM PDT by Grunthor (Wouldn’t it be music to our ears to hear the Iranian mullahs shouting “Incoming!”?)