I'm not saying that proves or disproves anything about Ron Paul, but your statement in his defense is simply not true.
I wasn't addressing the remarks about whether or not ron paul is a doper, I was addressing the false statement you made in defense of those remarks.
I couldn't care less if Ron Paul smokes crack, it matters not, since he is not going to be elected president, I posted because your statement was false and I wanted to point that out to you.
While we're at it, let's look at what you said here:
So a doctor who takes a drink is then a "doper"?
hate to be the one to point this out but... a doper is someone who uses drugs to alter their mood and their mindset... and... alchohol is a drug that is certainly used by most to accomplish that goal.