Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: George W. Bush
I'll say it again since you ignored it the last time:

I'm not saying that proves or disproves anything about Ron Paul, but your statement in his defense is simply not true.

I wasn't addressing the remarks about whether or not ron paul is a doper, I was addressing the false statement you made in defense of those remarks.

I couldn't care less if Ron Paul smokes crack, it matters not, since he is not going to be elected president, I posted because your statement was false and I wanted to point that out to you.

While we're at it, let's look at what you said here:

So a doctor who takes a drink is then a "doper"?

hate to be the one to point this out but... a doper is someone who uses drugs to alter their mood and their mindset... and... alchohol is a drug that is certainly used by most to accomplish that goal.

511 posted on 07/22/2007 11:10:29 AM PDT by Lirona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies ]


To: Lirona
a doper is someone who uses drugs to alter their mood and their mindset... and... alchohol is a drug that is certainly used by most to accomplish that goal.

I grasp your point about self-medicaters. I was focusing on the word 'doper'. Let me suggest that if you took a poll, 99.9% of Americans would identify "dopers" as users of illegal drugs. A few might, maybe, say "illegal drugs and alcohol". I'm talking about "doper" as a word and what it means to Americans.

Dopers are dopers and drinkers are drinkers to the average Joe in the street. Joe Blow doesn't include drinkers in the doper category.
515 posted on 07/22/2007 11:58:53 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson