Replies

Could he possibly be any worse then a drunken cocaine cowboy?

I'd like everyone to see this comment as a great example of what the paulistinians think of GWB. Our President is a man who has sacrificed more for the defense of his country than that hippie moonbat Paul, yet here he's called a "drunken cocaine cowboy".

It shows you where their priorities are.

yet here he's called a "drunken cocaine cowboy". It shows you where their priorities are.

I agree it is inappropriate to call W that. But, it is known tha the was an alcoholic and at least used cocaine a few times, whereas it is known that Paul is a teetotaler.

Therefore your calling Paul a dope smoker while objecting to calling bush an alcoholic cocaine uses is absurd.

Our President is a man who has sacrificed more for the defense of his country than that hippie moonbat Paul, yet here he's called a "drunken cocaine cowboy".

I'm not sure what Bush has sacrificed more than Ron Paul has. He doesn't deserve a throne any more than any other American president and you should get off your knees.

I almost said something to KDD about his remark because it does go too far, it seems to me. "Drunken", well, yes. He's an admitted reformed alcoholic. "Cocaine", rumored, never proven, to me Dubya doesn't really have that cocaine kind of personality, he'd be a beer guy. And "cowboy", well, Laura says he's not and I don't think she lets him ride horses but he does have a fancy little pickup he drives around the Crawford ranch rather slowly and Laura thinks he really enjoys it.

So, despite JimRob's rather famous post on the subject, neither cocaine nor cowboy is an appropriate description for our prez. Dried-out alcoholic is fair enough though.

There, KDD, consider youself scolded, you bad bad man!