[JTN]

It serves its purpose. For one thing, the expected Stormfront-guilt-by-association tactic was attempted, the first during the campaign. I will probably mail off the first 200 pages to...the appropriate persons. Our cadre needs to know how to respond to that specific attack. And we’ll see it again, no doubt.

I understand, but this guy has long since failed to post anything new or worthy of response. The only people convinced by anything he's been posting lately were convinced already, and in spite of the lack of evidence.

[George W. Bush]

No, not lormand. I mean, that dustup in the first 150 posts. I think it started around 61. See my #99 if you didn't notice it. Then the pictures of the marching neo-Nazis, the links to St*rmfr*nt, the ongoing innuendo.

lormand hasn't done anything like that. I don't think lormand even mentioned St*rmfr*nt, did he? (Personally, I hate to even type the word lest it draw undesirables to FR.)

[GlennD]

“I understand, but this guy has long since failed to post anything new or worthy of response.’

That’s correct. He just keep repeating what’s been completely disputed several times, never answers any questions, and returns to call names. Easiest to just ignore him. I figure, he must be working for the Rudy G campaign or maybe the democraps. One can only reason with somebody who is reasonable...uses some logic. -Glenn