[SJackson]

Relax, Puddleglum, you’re being played here by SJackson. Don’t fall for it. See my previous post. You’ll quickly realize that SJackson is working very hard to dig up all sorts of different ways to play the save-me-from-Ron-Paul’s-death-camps card. But two quick Googles is all it takes to find out the truth. But SJackson has another agenda here, one more important than the truth. SJackson is hoping to play this out, that no one will actually check.

BTW bozo, you need to clarify this "another agenda" stuff if you have the courage.

And you put the death camp stuff where the sun don't shine, as I've noted before the fixation by a few of the Paul supporters here on Jews, the Holocaust and Israel is a bit odd.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

BTW bozo, you need to clarify this "another agenda" stuff if you have the courage.

OH, NOES!!!!!

HE'S ON TO US, MAN! RUN, SJ! RUNNNNNNNNNNN -- !!! ;)

[JTN]

as I've noted before the fixation by a few of the Paul supporters here on Jews, the Holocaust and Israel is a bit odd.

Every time I have seen this subject come up, it was because some anti-Paul FReeper was trying to accuse Paul of anti-semitism. When Paul supporters discuss it, its because they're defending him; not because of a "fixation".

[Eric Blair 2084]

I take it you actually read the article:

NEW YORK A feature piece in this coming Sunday's New York Times Magazine on Republican candidate for president, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, portrays his followers as including a wild mix of "wackos" on both ends of the political spectrum. Paul, a libertarian, has been gaining media and public attention of late.

The cover line reads: "A Genuine Radical for President." The headline inside: "The Antiwar, Anti-Abortion, Anti-Drug-Enforcement-Administration, Anti-medicare Candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul."

Why would Salzberger and his henchmen and surrender monkeys at the New York Slimes go out of their way to devote a good portion of their Sunday magazine to a GOP candidate who A. Agrees with their Iraq War position and B. Has at the very least an uphill battle to get the GOP nomination?