Replies

The Ron Paul Bowel Movement - there fixed the title.

This 9/11 conspiracy nut, Gulf of Tonkin fool, cut and run surrender monkey that if he had his way Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent, only movement will be into the crapper.

Much of his kookiness was flying under the radar. Not anymore. Once he is thoroughly trounced nationwide in his run for the presidency and exposed nationwide for his nuttiness, he will be beaten by a competent GOP contender for his House seat. Ron Paul's days are numbered as a congressman and you can take that to the bank.

This 9/11 conspiracy nut, Gulf of Tonkin fool, cut and run surrender monkey that if he had his way Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent, only movement will be into the crapper.

Not to burst your little bubble but there are still plenty of countries where Muslim dictators (and other dictators) rape and murder just like Saddam. In fact, it's the default outside the West (and maybe the Polynesians) for most of human history. And even the West isn't immune.

So should we invade all of them? Or just the ones with a lot of oil?

Much of his kookiness was flying under the radar. Not anymore.

Actually, I think most people have known his views for a long time. Certainly at FR, among the Libertarians, etc. And he at least seems to be getting much more popular, not less.

It's that message of liberty, limited government and the Constitution. Maybe some of the also-ran candidates ought to give it a try. Some of us have noticed those FDT videos that are copied verbatim from Ron Paul's. Hey, no problem. We need more Republicans who believe in limited government, the Constitution and liberty. So Fred is welcome to share that message which has done so much for Ron Paul's campaign.

You know, if you pay attention to the interviews, Ron Paul himself is surprised at the surge in his support.

if he had his way Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent

Are you prepared to send our sons and daughters to liberate say, the hell-holes of Africa or N. Korea or any other place that's full of injustice and tyranny? Is that the standard for justifying an invasion? If not, spin the wheel again and choose another argument.