To: Rodney King
Paul doesn’t agree 100% with W on Iraq. Therefore he is a traitor who wants OBL to win. Or something like that.No. Ron Paul stated in the debated that we deserved 9/11 so therefore isn't sane enough to be CINC.
13 posted on
07/16/2007 9:33:43 PM PDT by
byteback
To: byteback
No. Ron Paul stated in the debated that we deserved 9/11 You sir are a liar. I challenge you to show where he said those words.
24 posted on
07/17/2007 4:34:43 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
To: byteback
No, he did not, unless you’ve chosen to believe Rudy Giuliani over your own ears.
40 posted on
07/17/2007 5:51:12 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
To: byteback
No. Ron Paul stated in the debated that we deserved 9/11 Not this again. What a load.
54 posted on
07/17/2007 6:42:08 AM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: byteback
What debate did you watch?
57 posted on
07/17/2007 6:49:39 AM PDT by
taxtruth
To: byteback
No. Ron Paul stated in the debated that we deserved 9/11...I CALL SHENANIGANS!
please back up this line of crap that you state ... a quote or transscipt would be nice ...
bet you can't
80 posted on
07/17/2007 8:04:13 AM PDT by
SubGeniusX
($29.95 Guarantees Your Salvation!!! Or TRIPLE Your Money Back!!!)
To: byteback
"No. Ron Paul stated in the debated that we deserved 9/11 so therefore isn't sane enough to be CINC."
No he didn't. He was just taking issue with "sound byte" political theory. You know, the short sentences of one and two syllable words that present an over simple view of reality but "make sense" to people who are incapable of thinking abstractly.
119 posted on
07/17/2007 10:43:53 AM PDT by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson