Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Conservatives Hate Their Own Founder? (Kirk)
Thomas E. Woods Homepage ^ | May 18th, 2007 | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

Posted on 05/18/2007 3:31:25 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2007 3:31:27 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
The times have changed. The enemy is not going to stop pursuing us even if we give up. We can no longer defend our country from our own shores. Conservatives need to be reminded isolationism was discredited by Pearl Harbor and 9/11 rendered it obsolete.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 05/18/2007 3:35:49 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

So the author is right. You are aghast at our own founder.


3 posted on 05/18/2007 3:37:39 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
I don't think of conservatism as rigid doctrine; more of a practical approach to life that must adjust to changing circumstances.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 05/18/2007 3:41:10 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

The message: War is Not the Answer (just like the bumper stickers all over liberal havens)
The Answer: The sound of crickets chirping.

Thanks very much Mr. Kirk, now tell us what we should to. Go home, work on the castle walls and wait for them to come over the side? No thanks. Sorry if playing offense offends you and the purity of your cause. If that’s being a “true” conservative, I’m not so fixated on the label.


5 posted on 05/18/2007 3:43:49 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You’re a pretty hard-core conservative then...


6 posted on 05/18/2007 3:44:08 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
I believe in defending this country first. The Democrats seek surrender. And for me, a good defense, to use a football analogy, begins with a good offense. Take it to the enemy!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 05/18/2007 3:45:53 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Do Conservatives Hate Their Own Founder?

What kind of garbage is this? Founder?

I had no idea that one who believes in obeying the law, the rules of society, manners and agreements such as contracts...including the Constitution, owe their existence to a FOUNDER!

Bullshit!

8 posted on 05/18/2007 3:50:33 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
He's not the founder of my beliefs. In fact I'd not heard of him until just now (theoreticallly, since I have now only read his name, I still have never heard of him).

My beliefs (based on my political thought, historical knowledge, and military service) include the concept of unrelenting war, pursuing the enemy where they may be found and destroying them until the survivors beg for mercy and then just a little more. If Mr. Kirk disagrees with that, then I call him wrong, "founder" or no.

9 posted on 05/18/2007 3:52:26 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Any means, fair or foul, to defeat the islamic filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I think you're right. The times we live in have changed dramatically. So has technology, transportation and society at large.

We've progressed to a point that the world has become much smaller than it was 50 years ago... and international affairs affect us more readily. Open borders doesn't help either. :)

10 posted on 05/18/2007 3:52:52 AM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
The author spends so much time "couching" Kirk's comments that the article is rather meaningless as a representation of "conservatism."

And those commenting about what Russell Kirk should do with himself should know: he's dead.

11 posted on 05/18/2007 3:53:01 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
He's not my founder.
12 posted on 05/18/2007 3:53:56 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Any means, fair or foul, to defeat the islamic filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Kirk then recalled Edmund Burke's rebuke to the Pitt ministry in 1795, when the British government seemed to be on the verge of going to war with France over the issue of navigation on the River Scheldt in the Netherlands.

Not the best example this "Kirk" guy could have chosen. Britain entered World War I because of the threat of invasion from Germany's occupation of the Scheldt estuary. The Scheldt has been a major part of strategic planning for British security up until the modern age.

13 posted on 05/18/2007 3:56:39 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH
His 1953 book, The Conservative Mind, is considered the foundation for post-WWII conservatism. Your ignorance of him proves Woods' Point.

Woods is a big conservative as well. Ever read "The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History"? That was him.

14 posted on 05/18/2007 4:02:59 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

He was talking about a previous war, not WWI!


15 posted on 05/18/2007 4:04:06 AM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
The world is what it is, and it is headed toward its destiny no matter what anybody thinks or does. There is only one important lesson you need to learn in life that ultimately has long term implications: the wages of sin is death, and the gift of God is eternal life through Christ. Everything else is temporary occupation of time and space.
16 posted on 05/18/2007 4:06:03 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I would think if anyone Russel Kirk appreciated conservatives who can think for themselves at least judging from The Conservative Mind.


17 posted on 05/18/2007 4:06:07 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
By the way, it's a childish title for a lot of reasons, Do Conservatives Hate Their Own Founder?, something I would expect to see in the local lefty street rag.
18 posted on 05/18/2007 4:13:48 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

1st off it pretty tough to be a “Founder” of anything when no one even remembers who you are. Maybe the Neo Isolationists might want to consider the fact that this guy is a forgotten embarrassment to Conservatives. That no one even remember his name doesn’t speak well for their attempt to recycle his dogmas. Then the Al Qeda cheerleaders pretending to be “Conservatives” should wake up to that fact that Isolationism has not been a viable political philosophy since the 1930s.


19 posted on 05/18/2007 5:12:40 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Why I am not a Conservative - F. A. Hayek

It can be argued that there scarcely is any such thing as a "conservative" in America. A "conservative" preserves the central idea of his society, and the central idea of American society is freedom. Yet freedom allows new things to happen, and allows the idea of progress. What American "conservatives" actually are is progressives. And what "progressives," so called, actually are is socialists.


20 posted on 05/18/2007 6:48:59 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson