Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/23/2006 9:27:00 AM PST by Jo Nuvark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jo Nuvark
I think the more important question here is, "What is the U.S. Constitution?"

Throughout the history of the U.S., the states, Congress, presidents and judges have rewritten nearly all of it, despite the idea that it was intended to be the final word unless altered by amendment.

Since the meaning of the Constitution and everything it contains is subject to the whims and fancies of the aforementioned entities, it has become little more than a doormat smudged with the dirty footprints of those who have twisted it over time.

2 posted on 03/23/2006 10:21:33 AM PST by Outland (Proud conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
The modern term for Militia is "Draft pool".
3 posted on 03/23/2006 10:21:58 AM PST by MrEdd (I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.- 2nd Amendment

It is at best a fool's errand and at worst abject subversion to try to decipher the nuances and emanations hidden in the wording of the Second Amendment. The words are clear. The Founders' intent is precise and clear. If anyone doesn't believe that, all they need to do is actually read the Founding Fathers written words regarding arms, the populace's God given rights and the government:

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed -- unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
--James Madison

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
-- George Mason

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
-- George Washington

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes....Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
--Thomas Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria in "On Crimes and Punishment", 1764.

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed."
--George Washington, speech of January 7, 1790

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
--Patrick Henry

"No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny in government."
-- Thomas Jefferson

"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
--Thomas Jefferson.

"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
-- THOMAS JEFFERSON, letter to William S. Smith, 1787, in 'Jefferson, On Democracy' (1939), p. 20

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
--Thomas Jefferson

These gentlemen knew exactly what they were doing and saying, and used quite precise, clear words to create a foundation of our Constitutional Republic - not a democracy or mutual admiration society. It is exquisitely clear that their meaning and intent was that each and every single person- not militia, gun club, titled land owner or government officer- had the right to own, possess and carry arms as they saw fit, and was not to be "interpreted", regulated or "permitted" by some government bureaucrat. It's there in their own words. Anyone who can't read and understand their plain meaning should go back to skool and get some remedial reading tutoring- it's not written in a foreign language.

And your wonderful, prized CCW is an infringement, no matter how you cut it. After all, it's called a "permit" isn't it? God given rights need no government "permits".

6 posted on 03/23/2006 12:18:48 PM PST by hadit2here ("Most men would rather die than think. Many do." - Bertrand Russell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

According to the U.S. government, and the governments of many states, mine included (PA), the militia is all able-bodied citizens between the ages of 17 and 45 (18 to 44 inclusive). Subject to be called upon at anytime by the Sheriff or other "proper authorities".


7 posted on 03/23/2006 12:21:09 PM PST by Supernatural (Ea wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
he Virginia Declaration of Rights, though it mentioned the militia, did not mention a right to bear arms -

But the current day, and probably much earlier, Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia does.

"That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power."
Article 1, Section 13. Virginia Constitution.

10 posted on 03/24/2006 8:32:34 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
Perhaps in the 1780's, the rise of a tyrant to a leadership position in the U.S. was a cause for concern. Today, the voters are much too sophisticated to elect a leader whose stated aims would be to suppress freedom or declare martial law

I dunno, they elected the 'toon, twice.

At the risk of terminating the thread, I'd only point out that Hitler was elected, in what was one of the most sophisticate countries s in the world.

11 posted on 03/24/2006 8:35:58 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark

Hmm...the problem with "definitive" proclamations, like the constitution of the United States, is that the world doesn't stand still. Attitudes change, situations change, certainly technology advances. The US implicitly recognises this, otherwise there wouldnt be all those amendments to the "inalienable rights".

My point, and I submit it humbly for your consideration, is that a well armed militia may very well have been quite a credible military force a hundred plus years ago, but the increasing sophistication of modern armies - artillery, missiles, tanks etc...probably means that a company of good citizens and true armed with an assortment of dodgy firearms is going to be considerably less effective relatively than their forebears would be pitched against a regiment of redcoats or whatever. You could even argue it might be morally wrong to pitch them into such a conflict.

Have I explained that well? Its difficult to make it very clear.


16 posted on 05/17/2006 2:42:48 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jo Nuvark
A well regulated militia means the standing army or the state militia (or local police). As they are needed for the defense of the state and/or can be used to supress the freedom of the people the 2nd amendment gives each individual the right to keep and bear arms so the people may rise up in revolution if need be. Remember this was written and approved by people who had just done that.
20 posted on 06/18/2006 3:42:47 AM PDT by warner.boru (Liberty-Void Where Prohibited By Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson