Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RECOVERING THE TRUTH & A COMING TO A CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF JESUS
Bet Emet Ministries ^ | Unknown | Craig Lyons

Posted on 07/01/2003 10:22:12 AM PDT by ksen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,781-1,8001,801-1,8201,821-1,840 ... 1,861 next last
To: SoothingDave
(REG) I assume, based on your supreme arrogance, that you mean the RCC when you speak of the "Church".

For this instance, yes.

You do realize of course there was no RCC when Jesus established His "church"?

(REG) Where do you find a promise that this "Church" is protected from error?

Scripture.

Citation?

(REG) Has this "Church" you speak of ever committed an error?

No.

So say you. My favorite quote concerning the "slippery" wording of the apologists was lost when the lightning hit my computer. Tch tch. 1,780 posted on 07/11/2003 3:00 PM EDT by SoothingDave

1,801 posted on 07/11/2003 12:31:08 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1780 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Yes, you are correct. One person, two natures, hypostatically united. Fuly God and fuly man.

Sounds Hellenistic to me. :-)

1,802 posted on 07/11/2003 12:31:33 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1797 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny); RnMomof7
Still that's pretty fast action!

I guess Mom has the mods in her hip pocket. LOL

SD

1,803 posted on 07/11/2003 12:33:29 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1800 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Let's pretend we've had this conversation before and cut to the chase, eh?

How's the weather up there? Is the sweet corn in yet? How about that sausage beating?

SD

1,804 posted on 07/11/2003 12:34:54 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1801 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I have had a very bad week..Beside having company (my adult kids) here for my husbands birthday I had a new OS and browser put on my computer. So I have been very inattentive . I posted to Angelo on a response to ET so I asked the monitor to delete it but of course but of course the way things are going I asked for the wrong post to be pulled..it is just the way things are right now :>)
1,805 posted on 07/11/2003 12:35:27 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1799 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; ET(end tyranny)
If I say the car has 100 % power windows and 100 % power mirrors, does that mean it really only has half of the windows and mirrors powered?

If you said the car is 100% power windows and 100% power mirrors what do you mean?
1,806 posted on 07/11/2003 12:36:09 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1785 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
If you said the car is 100% power windows and 100% power mirrors what do you mean?

What if I said it is 100 percent blue and 100 percent Japanese?

SD

1,807 posted on 07/11/2003 12:39:08 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1806 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
God did not call for a human sacrifice. You are reading that into it as did Abraham.
Genesis 22:1 And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.

2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.
Wow!

Sure looks like God is calling for a human sacrifice. That's probably what tripped up Abraham and me.

Now, if I could do that ... see the end from the beginning thing ... like God can, I would probably agree with you.

1,808 posted on 07/11/2003 12:47:30 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1788 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Sorry, Quester, you're all wet on this one. At the end of the story, do you think the lesson is that God wants human sacrifice or He does not?

SD

1,809 posted on 07/11/2003 12:49:53 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1808 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Yeshua and the apostles were to teach them to repent of their idolatrous ways and how to properly follow the commandments.

Strange ...

I don't recall Yeshua teaching on the subject of idols. And his first hearers were Jewish. The first christians were Jewish.

Did the Jews worship idols in Yeshua's day ?

1,810 posted on 07/11/2003 12:54:50 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Sorry, Quester, you're all wet on this one. At the end of the story, do you think the lesson is that God wants human sacrifice or He does not?

Obviously, He didn't in that situation (the one situation where He appears to call for it ... from us).

But, there's no way Abraham, going in, could have seen this.

I really was using this passage to refute the notion, posted by others, that Jesus was not a proper sacrifice, due to the various regulations on animal sacrifice.

1,811 posted on 07/11/2003 1:00:21 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1809 | View Replies]

To: Quester
I really was using this passage to refute the notion, posted by others, that Jesus was not a proper sacrifice, due to the various regulations on animal sacrifice.

Actually you make a very good point.

1,812 posted on 07/11/2003 1:11:40 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1811 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Obviously, He didn't in that situation (the one situation where He appears to call for it ... from us).

Or ever from us. The unwritten subtext is that Abraham's people may have indeed engaged in this type of thing, as neighboring peoples did. This "incident" is meant to teach us that God forbade human sacrifice.

But, there's no way Abraham, going in, could have seen this.

Exactly. That's why it was a test of faith.

I really was using this passage to refute the notion, posted by others, that Jesus was not a proper sacrifice, due to the various regulations on animal sacrifice.

You were better of with the argument that humans are not animals period, and if they were meant to be considered under dietary and sacrificial laws, that humans would be permanently "unclean."

To even hint that God wanted us to sacrifice humans is counterproductive.

SD

1,813 posted on 07/11/2003 1:18:01 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1811 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Far from condoning human sacrifice, we see that God does not want it.

From us.

Go and learn what this means, `I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.' (Matthew 9:13)

1,814 posted on 07/11/2003 1:19:54 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1779 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
freepmail
1,815 posted on 07/11/2003 1:20:55 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1814 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
You were better of with the argument that humans are not animals period, and if they were meant to be considered under dietary and sacrificial laws, that humans would be permanently "unclean."

To even hint that God wanted us to sacrifice humans is counterproductive.


I agree that my other argument was better. ;o)

1,816 posted on 07/11/2003 1:22:00 PM PDT by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1813 | View Replies]

To: Quester
I agree that my other argument was better. ;o)

What? Just when I said you made an excellent point? :-)

1,817 posted on 07/11/2003 1:23:02 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1816 | View Replies]

To: Quester
Do you interpret this literally?

Don't you ?

No, I have not literally become one flesh with my wife. Unlike the angler fish, we do not physically become one organism.

1,818 posted on 07/11/2003 1:24:02 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1784 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Thanks for the poking.

Happy to oblige.

There, now we've got it all sorted out.

Sorry, not done yet. ;o)

There was just one, the one Adam damaged. Jesus took this nature on and united it to the divine.

So the divine nature was joined to a damaged human nature? This would imply that Jesus was born with original sin.

1,819 posted on 07/11/2003 1:29:04 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Hosea (NAB) 6:5
For this reason I smote them through the prophets, I slew them by the words of my mouth;
6 For it is love that I desire, not sacrifice, and knowledge of God rather than holocausts.

Go and learn what this means, `I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.' (Matthew 9:13)

The notion of sacrifice being rote is repugnant to God. I think we all agree. However, after Hosea delivered this message God did not cease activity in the Temple, did he?

God ceased the sacrifices after He made the ultimate gesture to demonstrate that it is internal rather than external conversion he wants.

SD

1,820 posted on 07/11/2003 1:30:01 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1814 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,781-1,8001,801-1,8201,821-1,840 ... 1,861 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson