Geological Evidence for the British Throne of David?

M E R I D I A N M A G A Z I N E ^ | 2003 | by John P. Pratt

[restornu]

I don't know much about the others sources!

You keep trying to make this into some exclusived race thing, which it is NOT for all people are involed in this!

Because you are the one making these remarks I think you are the one who is trying to excluded!

I am talking about descendance geneology!

[restornu]

You have allowed yourself to be poison by such ignorance!

This is not the point of my Thread and I told you umteem times!

Did you know that their have been Black Nobliity on those European monrach thornes?

One of my friends did her Family History and found out that her descendance were part of that black nobility!

You never know what treasures your find in your family tree!

You are all Wet guess that why you are a fish!:)

[Auntie Dem]

I have serenghetti drivers and can read most of it. It says "...something...something...and the horse you rode in on..."

[Auntie Dem]

Do you have enough tin foil to go with that?

[Auntie Dem]

Hebrew doesn't do sideways.

How do you know the photograph isn't rotated 90 degrees?

Or in the alternative, how do you know it wasn't recently made by a perfectly good modern Hebrew?

Or in the alternate, alternative, what if the original ancient writer was a dyslexic Hebrew?

[4CJ]

Fascinating reading! Bookmarked for more study.

[Wilhelm Tell]

Of course, the neo-Nazis, the "Christian Identity" folks have all been immersed in BI.

I, too, am concerned with this "salvation by race" heresy. Who do these people think they are -- their ancestors were pagans 1000 to 1500 years ago, they claim that they are heirs to God's promises to ancient Israel (but they don't seem to think of themselves as heirs to God's judgements) and then they have the nerve to claim that an Ashkenazi Jew really isn't Jewish! I would love to get a Rabbi's take on this nonsense. Wait, don't tell me -- I'm sure someone will say that a Rabbi wouldn't know anything about ancient Israel!

Here's a news flash -- humanity is made up of thousands of "lost tribes," and all have earned nothing but God's judgement. Even the Apostle Paul couldn't claim that his background saved him. I think that the "Christian Identity" people would crucify Christ again and again with their hate.

[fishtank]

"Who do these people think they are -- their ancestors were pagans 1000 to 1500 years ago, they claim that they are heirs to God's promises to ancient Israel (but they don't seem to think of themselves as heirs to God's judgements)"


Another nail in BI's coffin.

[fishtank]

BI is an appeal to white boy racism, then the BIs add weirdo theology to the mix, then they stir in some Scripture twisting to fit the pet doctrines of whatever group they are involved in, be it the Mormons, the Armstrongites, or Christian Identity, and you get a mix of view points which have all led people away from true faith in the true Jesus Christ.

IXTHYS-tank

[fishtank]

Look, I don't pretend to know who the AC is. I just think PC is a candidate.

Do you think I need tin foil because I believe in a literal AC?

One of the reasons that I posted that article is because I am fundamentally suspicious of monarchy in all its forms. I thought Clinton was dangerous because his presidency was much too close to a system of emperor worship. We were very close to a situation like that of WWII Germany and Japan, where the all-powerful leader was seen by many (but not all) as a semi-divine being capable of being above the average human. The TV talking heads were sycpohantic in their adoration of Clinton, do you remember the blatherings of Eleanor Clift and Mark Shields? They were very, very close to that of emperor worship.

I did a lot of thinking and reading about the phenomenon of emperor worship because of Clinton, and I see the same tendencies in the admiration that people have for Monarchy - it is the worship of a Man (or a Woman), and I think it is dangerous at its' core.

The Founding Fathers of America were very wise when they implemented a system of divided powers because they believed in the basic fallen nature of man, so they refused to allow power to be concentrated in a single human person.

Only when these thoughts are considered can the book about PCharles be properly interpreted: too many people "worship the emperor", whoever he may be, and this tendency must be resisted.

[Bat_Chemist]

All this talk about the AC got me thinking...GWB is trying to broker a peace between Israel and Palestine, some kind of "Land-for-peace" swap. If this comes with a 7-year deal...

[fishtank]

The "road map" could be the route for a 7 year journey.

[Auntie Dem]

Do you think I need tin foil because I believe in a literal AC?

For just the belief in an actual AC, no. But a lot of this end times stuff is just too much over the top, and too paranoid to suit me.

I don't know whether the British coat of arms (or whatever it is called) contains many references to Israel because there really could be something to the 10 Tribes migrating to Europe, or whether those similarities are there because the Brits are clever counterfeiters connected to the AC and Satan.

I am torn over my opinion of whether Bill Clinton is the AC or Satan himself--maybe he's both.