Skip to comments.
Liturgical Renewal ordered by Vatican II
EWTN ^
| Colin B. Donovan, STL
Posted on 05/20/2003 4:47:18 PM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Desdemona
He was weak. That makes it "his fault." But he was also a lefty, and an intellectual. I.e., he was susceptible to the illusion that civilization, society--and the liturgy--could be remolded in conformity with a set of academic ideas or ideology. A milder form of the Soviet aim of making a new "Soviet man."
To: ninenot
Of course, at St. Peter's Basilica, the congregation has a lot to applaud. Not often so in AmChurch. The Amchurch dream dies hard but die it has. Deo gratias!
42
posted on
05/21/2003 1:11:56 PM PDT
by
BlackElk
(Viva Cristo Rey! Kumbayaisma delenda est.!)
To: maryz
I'm with Miss Manners on this one -- if God wishes to applaud in Church, He may...I'll go with David on this one.
Psalm 47:1 O clap your hands, all ye people; shout unto God with the voice of triumph.
To: Jim Noble; drstevej; BlackElk; Desdemona; sinkspur; maryz; TotusTuus
There's a mega-non-denominational church about 5 miles from my home, and the high school uses the nave for graduation ceremonies.
They have more audio/video in that place than a TV studio. It's stunning; the production values are very high.
With all due respect to your sentiments, the fact of the matter is that all of that stuff is there because the Blessed Sacrament is NOT there, nor is Holy Water.
And, yes, I do smile when I enter the place. They have done quite well; approximately 10% of their congregation of 10,000 or so are former RC's.
It is a smile of irony.
44
posted on
05/21/2003 1:47:08 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: maryz
True -- but it's that lovely, free-floating liberal guilt (if everyone's guilty, no one really is!) that only proves you're actually better than other people -- as long as you've properly seen the light and vote Democratic! 38 posted on 05/21/2003 10:30 AM PDT by maryz Valid point. Other people are guilty. The prideful liberals point their fingers at them.
To: ninenot
They have done quite well; approximately 10% of their congregation of 10,000 or so are former RC'sI'm not sure there is any such thing as a former RC.
It's one of the mysteries of the RCC that I'm working on.
Pax vobiscum
To: Jim Noble
Technically, you are correct. I believe the term used is "fallen-away Catholics" which identifies them as, ah, not-currently showing up at Mass...
47
posted on
05/21/2003 5:24:28 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: NYer
"63. In permitting and using musical instruments, the culture and traditions of individual peoples must be taken into account. However, those instruments which are, by common opinion and use, suitable for secular music only, are to be altogether prohibited from every liturgical celebration and from popular devotions.[44]"
GUITAR! Guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, guitar, and guitar.
48
posted on
05/21/2003 5:35:50 PM PDT
by
dsc
To: ninenot
Technically, you are correctWell, I didn't mean it "technically".
I know Protestants who have become Catholic (I nearly did myself). When Protestants become Catholic, they pretty much leave Protestantism behind.
OTOH, most "ex"-Catholics of my acquaintance (there are exceptions) remain obsessed with Catholicism. They are perhaps best described as "anti-Catholic Catholics", if that makes any sense.
Going to church is for them not an act of worship, but rather an act of rebellion.
To: Jim Noble
That's interesting. Outside of the "ex's" on FR, I don't really know any. So it's a defiance thing.
No wonder you're researching it.
50
posted on
05/21/2003 5:49:21 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: ninenot
No wonder you're researching it.My beloved wife and three beautiful daughters are Catholics.
If I could have, I would have.
To: Jim Noble
So, relatively speaking, you're in. GRRRROOOOOAAAAAANNNNNN
52
posted on
05/21/2003 6:22:41 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: ninenot
I like to think of myself as a fellow traveller.
Problem is, our new priest doesn't like fellow travellers.
You'd probably love him...
To: Jim Noble
I dunno---I have always enjoyed my relationships with Prots (of good will...) but have never missed an opportunity to drag them into the Church, mostly gently...
54
posted on
05/21/2003 6:44:22 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: ninenot
but have never missed an opportunity to drag them into the Church, mostly gently... Well, thanks for your good wishes.
The Protestant movement cannot reunify the church. A future pope could.
To: Jim Noble
Christos Voskrese! The Protestant movement cannot reunify the church. A future pope could. With no little help of the Work and Power of the Holy Spirit ;-)
56
posted on
05/21/2003 9:58:39 PM PDT
by
TotusTuus
( Voistinu Voskrese!)
To: ninenot
I believe the term used is "fallen-away Catholics" which identifies them as, ah, not-currently showing up at Mass... Like that uncle of Lucile Hasley's (convert -- wrote light Catholic essays in the 40s and 50s) who, when asked how long he was out [of the Church], answered, "Never was out -- just didn't go."
57
posted on
05/22/2003 3:42:21 AM PDT
by
maryz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson