Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Making Your Calling and Election Sure
http://www.heatandlight.org/slj/new_testament/2peter/tape1b.htm ^ | S. Lewis Johnson, Jr.

Posted on 11/06/2002 1:47:26 PM PST by drstevej

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last
To: editor-surveyor
If one is not 'elect' they will not want it to happen. - If you have a true interest in the things of the Lord, then you are elect.

How does one define a "true" interest in the things of the Lord? There are many who spend their lives searching. Are you saying they are all elect?

SD

41 posted on 11/07/2002 9:07:45 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; editor-surveyor
How does one define a "true" interest in the things of the Lord? There are many who spend their lives searching. Are you saying they are all elect?

Its their way of saying "I'm" sure "I'm" one of the elect that God had chosen, but you on the other hand....

BigMack

42 posted on 11/07/2002 9:13:20 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Its their way of saying "I'm" sure "I'm" one of the elect that God had chosen, but you on the other hand....

...are dunghills covered with snow.

(sorry, I love that phrase and just had to use it somewhere today!)

43 posted on 11/07/2002 9:30:58 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
***My goal is sanctification, and I will get there, with the grace of God. ***

Why so confident? Especially in view of the preposition "with" the grace of God. God's grace + your free will = no assurrance. Isn't that the RC formulation?
44 posted on 11/07/2002 9:32:27 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
***My goal is sanctification, and I will get there, with the grace of God. ***

Why so confident?

Well, cause with God all thigns are possible, right? I know what needs to happen in order to acheive salvation. All I need to do is to persevere, with God's grace to allow me to do just that.

Especially in view of the preposition "with" the grace of God. God's grace + your free will = no assurrance. Isn't that the RC formulation?

No, I don't think so. If I choose to ignore God's grace, I can be assured that He will disavow knowing me. If I choose to cooperate with God's grace, then I know that I will acheive salvation.

SD

45 posted on 11/07/2002 9:48:47 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
******My goal is sanctification, and I will get there, with the grace of God. ***

Shouldn't you say, I may get there."

***If I choose to cooperate with God's grace, then I know that I will acheive salvation.***

If you make it, you will have something to boast about, then!

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.

46 posted on 11/07/2002 9:53:38 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; drstevej
I have a rather simple question for you Dave:
  1. does God justify the ungodly?
  2. does God justify the godly?
One is 100% the Truth of the scripture and one is 100% a works based Pharisaical lie.
47 posted on 11/07/2002 10:05:51 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Shouldn't you say, I may get there."

"I will" is an expression of intent and determination.

***If I choose to cooperate with God's grace, then I know that I will acheive salvation.***

If you make it, you will have something to boast about, then!

Please. I thought you were above this silly type of arguing?

I threw in a handful of "with the grace of God"'s into my post. Do I need to get pedantic and use them everywhere?

Don't you know any better?

If I say that "I" am doing something, this is with the undersanding that it is actually God working through me.

Do you honestly think, after all I have said that I am some sort of Pelagian?

SD

48 posted on 11/07/2002 10:11:34 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
What do you mean by "ungodly?"

SD

49 posted on 11/07/2002 10:12:35 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
The point is... your view is synergistic, semi-Pelagian.

***If I say that "I" am doing something, this is with the undersanding that it is actually God working through me***

You are also saying you can frustrate the working of God or cooperate with it with the result effecting your eternity. You then are ultimately the deciding factor. Thereby, giving you reason to commend yourself.

Call this argument silly if you wish. I consider it highly substantive.

***"I will" is an expression of intent and determination.***

intent = I want to
determination = I will try to

When I say I will make it, it is a fact based upon God's promise and dependability. It is a matter of His intent and His determinatiuon.
50 posted on 11/07/2002 10:18:34 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Actually, I think the better question is "what do you mean by "godly?"

I'm not sure what you are asking. As far as I can tell, though we are made in his image, we are all "ungodly," meaning that we are not god, we are not divine.

SD

51 posted on 11/07/2002 10:20:05 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; drstevej

If one is not of the elect, according to Calvinism this cannot happen. ~ BigMack

Let's just suppose for a moment that you hate cheesecake and let's just suppose for a moment that I absolutely love cheesecake. Let's suppose that you absolutely love a big thick mesquite grilled rib eye and let's suppose that I love a good rib eye, but not as much as I love cheesecake. Let's also suppose that by lot (lanchano in the Greek) the cheesecake falls to me and the steak falls to you. You really have no cause to complain about not getting the cheesecake for what right do you have to complain about not getting something which you hate anyway?

52 posted on 11/07/2002 10:20:35 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
The point is... your view is synergistic, semi-Pelagian.

Nope. Wrong. Sorry. I know you'd like it to be, but that doesn' make it so.

***If I say that "I" am doing something, this is with the undersanding that it is actually God working through me***

You are also saying you can frustrate the working of God or cooperate with it with the result effecting your eternity.

That's right. We have free will choices. Did Adam and Eve choose to disobey God, or did He make them do it?

You then are ultimately the deciding factor. Thereby, giving you reason to commend yourself.

If I have the pwoer to decide for God, it is only because He gave me the grace to choose Him. There is no reason to commend a person for responding to God's grace.

Call this argument silly if you wish. I consider it highly substantive.

I call jumping on a person's language and going "A Ha!" because of its appearance silly. Instead of trying to get what I am saying, you assume I am Pelagian cause I use the word "I."

That's beneath a serious discussion.

When I say I will make it, it is a fact based upon God's promise and dependability. It is a matter of His intent and His determinatiuon.

And it is based on the fact that you must perform good works, or else your sense of "dependability" is shown to be false.

SD

53 posted on 11/07/2002 10:26:46 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; drstevej; american colleen; SoothingDave
Let's just suppose for a moment that you hate cheesecake and let's just suppose for a moment that I absolutely love cheesecake. Let's suppose that you absolutely love a big thick mesquite grilled rib eye and let's suppose that I love a good rib eye, but not as much as I love cheesecake. Let's also suppose that by lot (lanchano in the Greek) the cheesecake falls to me and the steak falls to you. You really have no cause to complain about not getting the cheesecake for what right do you have to complain about not getting something which you hate anyway?

Calvinism goes into a realm of human philosophy. It is NOT a Bible doctrine, but a system of human philosophy appealing somewhat to the proud mind. Consider first that what we are discussing is called "Calvinism." "It was Calvin who wrought out this system of theological thought with such logical clearness and emphasis that it has ever since borne his name".

How strange that, after 1,400 years of Christianity, practically no one had understood the Bible to teach Calvin's doctrine of predestination until he formed the philosophy! What a strangely hidden doctrine, that New Testament Christians could go for nearly for 1400 years until the days of the reformers, when Calvin developed the doctrine fully.

It is obvious that great groups of Christians have always found salvation by grace in the Bible. The Bible is very clear on that. It is also clear on every other great doctrine.

BigMack

54 posted on 11/07/2002 10:29:12 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Let's just suppose for a moment that you hate cheesecake and let's just suppose for a moment that I absolutely love cheesecake. Let's suppose that you absolutely love a big thick mesquite grilled rib eye and let's suppose that I love a good rib eye, but not as much as I love cheesecake. Let's also suppose that by lot (lanchano in the Greek) the cheesecake falls to me and the steak falls to you. You really have no cause to complain about not getting the cheesecake for what right do you have to complain about not getting something which you hate anyway?

Which is a big, convoluted way of saying God likes them best. Calvin's god knows you need a cheescake to enter heaven, but he won't give you one. And you are supposed to be happy about this, cause this god made you not want cheesecake in the first place.

SD

55 posted on 11/07/2002 10:29:20 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; drstevej
ungodly ~ destitute of reverential awe towards God, condemning God, impious

godly ~ the opposite of ungodly
  1. Does God justify the ungodly?
  2. Does God justify the godly?
One is 100% Biblical and the other is 100% a works based Pharisaical lie.
56 posted on 11/07/2002 10:30:09 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

More later. I'm headed back to the office.
57 posted on 11/07/2002 10:31:49 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
Does God justify the ungodly?
Does God justify the godly?

I'm gonna say #1. Am I right?

God makes the first move, we can not move towards Him until He first moves us.

SD

58 posted on 11/07/2002 10:34:30 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; CCWoody; drstevej
Which is a big, convoluted way of saying God likes them best. Calvin's god knows you need a cheescake to enter heaven, but he won't give you one. And you are supposed to be happy about this, cause this god made you not want /cheesecake in the first place.

Mark the date 11/7/02! We agree! :)

Calvinism is a false doctrine.

BigMack

59 posted on 11/07/2002 10:36:05 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Mark the date 11/7/02! We agree! :)

LOL. Not only that, but more astonishing (IMO) you're here using an historical argument. (Saying that Calvinism was invented recently.)

SD

60 posted on 11/07/2002 10:41:18 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson