Common Creationist Arguments - Pseudoscience

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Creationism/Arguments/Pseudoscience.shtml ^

[<1/1,000,000th%]

You guys are really rockin' today!

But I can't believe you'd compare any FReeper to AlGore. It makes me feel dirty.

[Junior]

Evidently all that forking is how we got to be here ...

[Nebullis]

I thought it was pretty funny. Don't you think that's a typical PH-ism?

[VadeRetro]

I took your post as meaning what you meant. Try, try not to tap dance.

Do you deny posting as No-Kin-To-Monkeys?

I deny posting as No-Kin-To-Monkeys, yes. In fact, when he first appeared, IIRC I accused him of being an ADA or DU plant. (I was reacting to that screennie, mostly, although those early posts did strike me as having a certain caricature quality.)

If I wanted to impose someone on the other side, I'd impose gore. Really. Or you.

[AndrewC]

I took your post as meaning what you meant

That's a first.

[Junior]

Great minds wallow in the same sty...

[PatrickHenry]

...fork-fork-fork all the way down.

It was funny, and I told him so. I always assumed that if an evolutionist showed up here disguised as a creationist, he'd behave like g3k or something, and try to bring maximum discredit upon the creationist side. Ol' No-Kin wasn't that a bad guy, really, so there goes that theory.

[Nebullis]

It sounded like you, Patrick! Junior, apparently, thinks you are not capable of that type of humor.

[VadeRetro]

She knows lots more about this stuff than I do.

Somebody accused me of being jennyp before. She knows a lot more of the biochem stuff than I do. My shortcomings in that area get pointed out to me more than would happen if I knew as much as she does.

All: For the record, I have never posted to FR under another name. I know of no one who has other than some publicly announced switchers. (Dales / Hugh Akston, One-Who-Knows / OWK, one or two others I can't quite dredge up.)

[Nebullis]

Of course, it didn't quite rise to the level of "loose lips sink ships"...

[Nebullis]

Storm Orphan and his multiple incarnations.

[oldcats]

ANOTHER theory???
Oldcats

[AndrewC]

, I'd impose gore. Really. Or you.

No, you'd need a new one. We are real.

To: No-Kin-To-Monkeys

I think you came right out of central casting. But you're in the right place.

21 Posted on 04/02/2001 18:23:26 PDT by PatrickHenry

[VadeRetro]

In this post, on April 2, 2001, we have the initial appearance of No-Kin-To-Monkeys in a post to PatrickHenry. I am in a virtual screaming match with one Babylon, who has triumphantly announced a falsification of one of the predictions of the "29 Evidences" article. (Whales have an airway separate from their blowholes.)

In my first post to No-Kin, I wondered if he hadn't signed up a day late. (What is April 2 minus one day?)

Indeed, his affable side had not yet emerged. Still, if this is a fake on my part, I'm pretty good.

[VadeRetro]

I see you found it before I did. How do you keep your delusional system intact?

[Nebullis]

How do you keep your delusional system intact?

ROFL!

I wonder why nobody else is laughing today?

[js1138]

Bumping for later reading

[oldcats]

I am laughing....just on the inside.
Oldcats

[VadeRetro]

Storm Orphan and his multiple incarnations.

The infamous Eschoir, beast of a thousand names.

[f.Christian]

Where is the science in Creationism?
Again, I ask that you use the same eye on your theory as you do one mine.
Lets see the FACTS that support your "science". Oldcats

1992 posted on 3/26/02 4:48 AM Hawaii-Aleutian by oldcats

Evolution--animal morphing--change is anti-science.

Science like God--Creator--Creation is immutable/LAWS---no change--shadow--turning.

Evolution is half whore/virgin---how can that be? Opposites??