[Supreme] Court Allows N.Y. Health Worker Vaccine Mandate Without Religious Exemption

Catholic News Service ^ | 7/1/22 | Carol Zimmermann

[jimwatx]

But this “vaccine” doesn’t prevent transmission, so what exactly is the point of mandating it? And why isn’t there a way to opt out of the vaxx if one can prove natural immunity? The Supreme Court dropped the ball on this.

[EasySt]

If an experimental vaccine can be mandated, so can ANYTHING.

Sterilization, Abortion, Euthanasia, Social/Financial Quarantine, Gulag....

Does one have to be demon possessed to design the world they are making for us?

[ocrp1982]

This BS is very much a part of the reason Americans are leaving Leftist states in droves for states like Florida and Texas.
The problem is that too many go there and continue to vote the exact way they did in the Leftist states they ran away from. Leftists are NOT logical people. They are the exact opposite. Cause and effect is a foreign concept.

[lizma2]

How can our S.C. be so fricken clueless??

This jab comes with a lot of bad news.

And they haven’t noticed???

Very scary times. And then some.

[NWFree]

Only God can help you now 🤪

[Therapsid]

No you are just delusional ... or already Intrinsically manipulated

[Therapsid]

Just try to scrape what’s left of your courage into a pile and go read Klaus Schwab’s book depicting exactly what was to be done

[BuddhaBrown]

There should be NO religion-based exemptions for anything.

Our rights are from God, not from man-made religions.

[Svartalfiar]

There should be NO religion-based exemptions for anything.

Our rights are from God, not from man-made religions.

Oh? And how do you know that? If you can't say that a specific religion is the correct one, then how can you definitively say anything correct about God?

If there is a God independent of any known religion, why should no one receive any exemptions based on God's ideals? Why should no one have any freedom of religion, simply because you think they picked the wrong religion?

[BuddhaBrown]

“Why should no one have any freedom of religion...”

What’s wrong with simple Freedom?

Why leave the decision on whether you are allowed Freedom to a pair of man-made institutions - govt and religion?

The Declaration is still as relevant today as the Constitution.

[piusv]

Why can’t there just be mandatory testing then? Why do people HAVE to be vaccinated, especially when vaccinated people can STILL infect others??

[piusv]

Did the Supreme Court drop the ball? Or did they make this decision to assuage some due to their recent decision on Roe v Wade?

[mewzilla]

If you thought the quality of healthcare in NYS was bad before, especially Upstate...

[Gay State Conservative]

No you are just delusional ...

Or maybe it's just that I've seen more dead people than you've had hot meals.

[Therapsid]

Then you should Know better

[Svartalfiar]

“Why should no one have any freedom of religion...”

What’s wrong with simple Freedom?

Because the conversation is about religious exemptions. Which would fall under freedom of religion. Simple freedom is rather vague and has no implications for freedom of/from anything...? Does "simple freedom" include freedom of religion? Or does it ignore religion? That's why the Amendments were passed - they help define and thereby safeguard what all your "simple freedom" entails.


Why leave the decision on whether you are allowed Freedom to a pair of man-made institutions - govt and religion?

And who else do you expect to form a society and determine how your freedoms are enumerated/defined? Without religion or government, how do you expect society to form and people to enjoy more freedom? Does every person simply writ up their own list of what freedoms they claim? What if my neighbors' freedoms include taking my land? Good thing one of my freedoms is to shoot them when they step foot on what I claim, and then take their holdings, right?


The Declaration is still as relevant today as the Constitution.

What does that have to do with the conversation?

[BuddhaBrown]

"...the conversation is about religious exemptions."

Yes. Exemptions.

It appears my use of the term 'simple Freedom' is causing you trouble. I certainly did not mean the anarchy you describe. I'm only objecting to your notion that some of my individual freedoms can be curtailed because I don't belong to the correct sect.

America is exceptional. Because we were founded on the notion that our rights are an individual God-given thing, not something based on which clubs I join.

We have today the great example of SwampVax mandates. Why on God's green Earth would you want my freedom from govt coercion to be based on the rules of one of the clubs I join? Or don't join. I'm a Christian just like any other Catholic, Lutheran, etc. I don't have any less God-given individual freedoms than those folks.

Again, by 'simple' Freedom, I mean EVERY individual American should be free from SwampVax mandates. Not just those in certain clubs.

I never suggested simple freedom means no gov't at all. Govt is a necessary evil. But your anarchy examples involving stealing and murder are actually more likely under your group-based rights. That thinking is played out on the news every day: BLM gets sympathy and extraordinary leeway to loot and destroy - based on race. Freaks and perverts get to use wrong bathrooms and prance around your kids mostly naked - based on membership in the Pride cult.

In America, laws are supposed to apply to everyone equally. Thus the blindfold on Lady Justice. The Left is always trying to remove that blindfold. I hate to see the Right doing the same.