| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/24/2022 5:40:39 AM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 03/06/2022 11:16:06 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
I think the biggest reason I don’t believe in evolution, is because God created them male and female. They were created whole and complete. No evolution needed. 👍
“Modern medicine does NOT believe in evolution.”
BS
Your inability to accept evolutionary theory has nothing to do with whether or not it’s true.
Amen! Very much agreed, Mark.
—> Your inability to accept evolutionary theory
Pretty sure it has nothing to do with inability and everything to do with straight out rejection.
Your ability to respond to a comment not directed to you is astonishing.
I never directed any comment to you, but you responded to me. That is astonishing. It’s an open forum. AMPU can respond to anyone. He is right, however, I don’t have an inability to accept the THEORY of evolution. I just totally, completely, 100% outright reject it. You can believe whatever you like. I don’t believe in evolution, at all. Never will. I will not discuss evolution with you any further.
Does my post 2887, about sum it up? 👍😀 Sorry, but I am simply not going to discuss it, and I couldn’t care less what anyone thinks about it. 😊
That should about sum it up, Sir.
Thank you. It’s a theory from the lowest part of the lake of fire.
That is no doubt its true source because it did happen to come directly from Babylon of all places. It was not original with Darwin or his grandfather’s Lunartic Society (pub club) who tried to pass it off to Darwin as real, not knowing he’d believe it and go forth with it.
(This info used to readily available on the Internet until TPB started their scrubbing.)
Good morning bro. 😀
I was pretty sure it started long before Darwin came along. 😀😊
I ask you again, whom do you believe the Remnant to be, Phil?
No articles, please. You’re presumably a grown man who can speak for himself.
What law is being referred to in post 2520 (every example)?
You’re presumably a grown woman who can speak for herself.
——>Why don’t you call the law firms of those who have documented EGW’s plagiarism?
I’m still waiting for you to show me one.
You are out of touch with science.
Science cannot definitively say whether something is true or not. Nor does a theory rise to the level of certainty of a law, which is still not truth, but simply is something that has not been disproven YET.
Nothing in science is settled because science cannot “prove” anything. It can only disprove things.
Nor is the ToE that well supported. Variation within species does not translate into the kind of evolution necessary to support the current understanding of the theory.
Perhaps you could show me some situations where a change in the number of chromosomes of an individual in a species does NOT have a deleterious effect on that individual. Something that would be enough of a change genetically to cause a species change. In humans, as a far as I’ve ever seen, any changes in the genome ALWAYS results in a compromised and less fit individual.
Change my mind.
Can I take it that you didn’t much care for my Biblical quotes regarding the remnant?
——>You’re avoiding the question like the plague, Phil. Are you part of the remnant or not?
Of course I am.
Hit me up when you get your mind changed. Ha, ha.
Says the FReeper who jumped into a conversation about a topic where (s)he was neither pinged nor addressed.
Such rank hypocrisy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.