Posted on 05/11/2020 5:47:57 PM PDT by ebb tide
So much for Catholic ladies and young girls wearing dresses or skirts to Stikamasses.
Stika responded, Actually, the bishops did not. A group made some recommends, actually three for the reception of the Eucharist. But bishops must follow their own conscience.
So much for all that "collegiality" and "universal Church"; francisbishops are each their own little dictators when it comes to breaking canon law.
Ping
Ah well I guess there IS something you can do to be banned from Mass.
Not running abortion clinics or passionately defending evil on the floor of Congress though.
First, as per is ungrammatical, Your Excellency. Second, it amazes me the dismissive tone that so many of these cretins dare to take with their flocks who are hungering for the sacrament
Just FYI. There's always a way, IMHO.
Theres something off about Stika.
Also, his new cathedral is Disneyland-classical - all the trappings, none of the substance.
Ya gotta lick both paws palms. Like a cat.
That is desecration of the Body of Christ.One does not use a pocket. In fact, one is not allowed to do this or leave the Mass without consuming.
The pocket was in reference to the mandatory face mask, not the Sacred Host.
The only criticism I've heard from (some) fellow Knoxville Catholics is that it was expensive. The counter-argument I've heard, is that it was built to last 500 years. Someone said it had "no substance"? I disagree.
To me, it looks like a Catholic Church, which is, I think, what was wanted.
It has an altar --- a real Catholic altar, substantial and of stone, with relics embedded, not a little wooden Cranmer table--- under a baldacchino on which Mass can be celebrated ad oriéntem as well as versus pópulum, a Communion Rail, a respectable pulpit, and traditional sacred art adorning its dome.
There’s always a way, IMHO.
Good comments and I agree. Those who want to find obstacles will find obstacles. Those who want to find solutions will find solutions.
Last time I just licked my receiving hand. Like a cat. Or like some Byzantine Catholics do when they receive the antidoron. I don’t think it quite makes sense to lick your other hand that didn’t even touch the Sacred Host. Why would you think so?
The pocket is for the FACE MASK, not for the HOST, God forbid.
Yes all the trappings.
Architecturally it is a plastic banana.
It looks Renaissance but does not feel or sound such.
Authenticity is as important in building as it is in theology. A building pretending to be that which it is not, is in my opinion, scandalous.
I have been to the cathedral several times.
There is some exceptional new classical churches. This is not one of them.
So its pretending to be a cathedral?
Or do some just palm lick the Holy Eucharist?
Or do some just palm lick the Holy Eucharist?
Picking a fight with a straw an Marty? Come on - you are better than that...
The way it worked here, is that Fr. Dustin, accompanied by an acolyte with a paten, administered to us as we were kneeling. Fr. Dustin just held out the Sacred Host and sort of dropped it into my receiving hand (left), and I brought my receiving hand immediately and directly to my mouth and consumed the Host. And then quietly and unobtrusively licked the palm of my receiving hand without (I think) anyone else noticing.
As a post-note. In the TLM, the priest’s thumb and forfingers, the only ones that touch the Sacred Host at the Consecration, remain clenched together throughout distribution of Holy Communion to the faithful, except for the administration of the Host to each communicant, in which case the priest’s fingers remain constantly over the ciborium and then the paten under the communicant’ chin.
No palm licking required.
That’s one reason I vastly prefer TLM. Plus, I’m a member of the Schola Cantorum, and I love that to the depths of my tessitura.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.