Posted on 11/24/2018 9:07:32 PM PST by pastorbillrandles
“Did God Truly Say,,,?”
The Serpant.
Good read, thank you.
No I am not familiar, is Klerk a gnostic?
No, Kleck is not a gnostic. He comes from a Christian perspective, albeit unorthodox. Although by unorthodox, I don’t mean necessarily flawed or heretical. But definitely different than most mainstream, traditional interpretations of certain key biblical events. He examines many things contained within Gnosticism, the Sitra Achra, Kabbalah, the occult, etc., and the imagery and symbolism they contain, not to hold them up as something redeeming or worthwhile, but in order to point out the the agenda and recurring themes of all Luciferian religions, such as transhumanism, issue of duality, transmutation process of human souls that is pursued and advanced by the enemy, etc.
Here’s an example of one of his main differences with traditional doctrine as taught by most Christian organizations.
Genesis 1:26 - And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness...
The word “God” is from the Hebrew word “Eloheem” or “Elohim”. The Hebrew definition is “God or gods in the ordinary sense... occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates, Angels, judges...”
The Bible uses “Eloheem” to sometimes refer to the Supreme God and sometimes to refer to magistrates, Angels, judges. One could say that the Supreme God is Eloheem, but not all Eloheem are the Supreme God.
The word “image” is from the Hebrew word “tselem”. The Hebrew definition is “to shade, a phantom, an illusion, resemblance; hence a representative figure, especially an idol. A vain shew.
On this basis, along with further corroborating support, Kleck proposes that man’s (Adam’s) creator was not the Supreme God, but rather Lucifer (Eloheem) and some of the other Angels in his camp. Adam, being created in Eloheem’s image (shade, phantom, illusion, idol, vain shew), is not a person or entity properly reflecting the image of the Supreme God.
Why would Lucifer and his Angels create this “phantom, illusion, idol, vain shew” of a human being? If this is true, then who are we, really, as humans, and what is our value that would elicit the sacrifice of the Son of the Supreme God?
These are questions not quickly answered, and for another discussion.
I think you would agree, not your typical, traditional Sunday School perspective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.