Posted on 09/03/2018 9:36:20 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
...but I won't blow the whistle on non-Catholics if you want to constructively discuss how to get more Catholic women's signatures on this Open Letter to the Pope.
In the meantime, report n when you've gotten your Catholic wife and all of her Catholic lady friends to sign the letter, OK?
Even if PF does not take notice, it will help the secular press to take notice, and in this case the press should not be siding with secrecy, they should be demanding disclosure.
When I was sexually abused at age 7...Saint Luke’s Barrington RI by a visiting pedopriest...
Monsignor O’Gara knew
Father Brennon knew
All the nuns knew
They talked my parents into not pressing charges. For my own sake.
Nice con job
However...as noted before to you....this is the opinion of a Roman Catholic Canon Lawyer.
Unless you're a RC Canon lawer, I'm going with what she says.
e, you are correct. Regardless of what’s printed in a big book, this pope will not be judged. He has not been, nor will he be. Laws are irrelevant. He is pope and no one will touch him.
Remember St. Catherine of Siena, she let the Pope in her time have it. If she could have walked this earth today, she would this hashtag:
#Catholicmetoo .
I have come to the realization that Cardinal Borrego is an antiPope.
In segregating yourselves this way you are defying God’s intent for men and women.
If there were no other theological problems with it, it echoes the actions and ideology of feminism, itself of and from Satan.
Besides that, it’s just fricking obnoxious.
The Church is in schism/civil war.
I did take a quick look and it is from Catholic women with positions and ministries.
Sorry but I still don’t understand.
I understand that but that wasn't my concern.
What my concern is that in signing the letter all you have to do is give your NAME, your EMAIL, STATE and COUNTRY.......And there you go, you're a "Catholic" who supports whatever this letter is citing......
While I'm not an atheist, I'm also not a Catholic but I can sign the letter and claim to be...............
Creating bad will between the sexes is on the agenda of every front group that Satan has up and running, including the communists.
Limbaugh listed a bunch of reasons for feminism, but the primary goal was to turn women into things that are incapable of being good wives and mothers.
Every time women announce a “women’s this” or “women’s that,” it contributes to that goal. Just as whites are sick of being persecuted for the sake of ungrateful and undeserving minorities, men are sick of being persecuted and disadvantaged in every walk of life for the sake of resentful, hostile, and closed-minded women.
It does not have an anti-Catholic tone, content or intention in the least. If I were an infected, overheated anti-Catholic I would find it much, much too constructive.
`
Right now the focus is not only on the direct offenses, but on the widespread shielding of perps within the institution.
This was, in part, corrupt institutional self-protecting. They were protecting the institution, not the abuse victims. This is disgusting, sinful and in some times criminally actionable.
But it was also IN PART, AT ONE TIME, wrong-headed but well-intended. In the 60’s-80’s the main focus in both the Church AND the State was the therapeutic model. Not only didn’t bishops turn the perps in: parents didn't either. They begged not to have it go through the legal system, didn’t want their kids dragged through this in public, didn’t want kids re-traumatized by the trial process, AND agreed that both their kid and Fr. Judas A. Huggybear probably needed psych intervention or counseling.
Police didn’t want to arrest, just like they didn’t want to arrest in domestic violence incidents: they wanted “community corrections” and “pre-trial diversion.” Prosecutors AND JUDGES didn’t want to prosecute: they wanted to refer to remediation outside of the court system.
I remember this all through the 1970's in the Diocese of Erie (Pennsylvania) when I was an active volunteer both in juvenile and prison issues.
All that has gone by the wayside because it is NOW recognized that offenders actually don’t respond well, long-term, to counseling: they-offend. Plus, people under-estimated the long-term harm this did to the victims. Some actually thought “making a big thing of it” would harm the children: the kids might be temporarily upset but best just smooth it over and all memories will heal.
I was told that by psychologists!! --years ago when I worked as a volunteer in shelter work for kids who were in protective residential placements, and prison justice initiatives.
I do not at all think “most” of (today's) priests or “most" of (today’s) bishops are either abusers or concealers. What we’re getting is a telescopic picture of the mid-to-late 20th century and its lingering consequences; not an ongoing pattern for the future.
As I see it.
The main thing now is to uproot the real corrupt-o-crats in the higher clergy, who are mostly wizened, pampered old reprobates who have been in CYA mode for decades. They are hell-bait. I hope they repent before they die.
It may take criminal indictments to do it.
I am all for criminal indictments for perjury, concealing of evidence, obstruction of justice and related crimes, even if it goes all the way up to the Pope.
Big problem with petitions: those who write them think they are saying something powerful and important, when actually they sound like petulant and ignorant whiners. Add the inevitable demands (which the signers usually have no right to make) and it does get obnoxious. Petitions are ordinary people writing to extraordinary people and making fools of themselves. No matter your momentary thrill of self-importance, you achieve nothing by signing an internet form most use to vent spleen, nothing more.
Signed!
If it were not for you and the Church Militant, I’d have much less knowledge about what is going on in my world. Thank you so much.
This is the opinion of a Roman Catholic Canon lawyer.
If something has happened many time historically, it is absurd for you to say it is impossible.
Again...I do not say it....a Roman Catholic Canon lawyer does.
So that's why my advice to you is, as always: in matters Catholic, ASK us, do not TELL us, what we can and cannot do.
I did. I went to canonlawmadeeasy.com for the answer to my question.
You so often make puerile pronunciamentos as if you knew a lot about the matter at hand, when, so frequently, you demonstrate that you do not.
Again...I went to canonlawmadeeasy.com for my answer.
Getting off that high horse of yours might take a while.
The opinion of the Roman Catholic Canon lawyer is there is nothing that can be done to remove Francis from office....hence why I say you can collect 100,000,000 signatures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.