Posted on 08/03/2018 9:55:47 PM PDT by unlearner
So ebb tide is not only rude, he (or she) is slothful. What gives you the right to claim the high ground morally and yet denigrate this person in such terms? My experience of ebb tide is that he/she is generally a cool customer who refrains from getting into arguments with people. Unlike me. Ebb tide generally just likes to post articles.
Oh, and please give us all those examples of Protestant caucuses being breached by wild-eyed, Protestant-hating Catholics since you are so hepped up on it. From what I’ve seen, they are mostly devotionals. Even the Protestants don’t breach the Catholic devotionals.
But now, even if they qualify, they can be reposted as an open forum in less than four hours of the original, like this one was done.
Back that up with a link or post a retraction of that total misrepresentation.
I have NEVER done that.
I don't know if you read the Bible but here is what it says about what you just did:
Proverbs 19:5 King James Version (KJV)5 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.
Exodus 20:16 King James Version (KJV) 16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Your post #212.
Dear All, Everybody, everyone:
I have NEVER been with miss marmelstein.
Although I would love to sit down with her and explain the Gospel message to her using God's Word.
I’m still waiting for the examples of Catholics invading evangelical/Protestant posts.
I did NOT defend non-Catholics breaking caucus guidelines.
In fact in another post I showed where it was wrong and should not be done.
Try again, you will NOT find what you are looking for.
Use strong reading comprehension when you do to prevent more accusations towards me.
Here is another scripture for you to ponder, a nice gentle one:
Ephesians 4:25 King James Version (KJV)25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
Where’s the proof that we Catholics are invading Protestant caucuses? I’ve asked several times now.
Quote:
"...give us all those examples of Protestant caucuses being breached by wild-eyed, Protestant-hating Catholics since you are so hepped up on it."
Another example of not respecting the guidelines, personal and mindreading.
Oh and LOL @ hepped up...
For "all" the description posted; "wild-eyed, Protestant-hating Catholics" is miss marmelstein's vision of her faith mates, not mine.
He’s going to wait until I’m more civil, lol.
You can’t make this kind of dishonest stuff up.
Syncro: go work for CNN & MSNBC; they undestand your kind of reporting and statistical evidence.
Yes, you did.
You defended non-Catholics posting on Catholic caused threads with this, "Some times OTH (Other Than Catholic) posters post on Catholic caucused threads because many of them don’t qualify for the Catholic caucus designation."
It's not up to a poster to determine what qualifies as a caucus. If you want to have a caucus label removed, go to the moderators.
A few years ago, a long time non-Catholic Freeper posted some threads on the Religion Forum that were positive about the Reformation and Evangelical/Protestant doctrines in opposition to Roman Catholicism and some RCs were so incensed by them they were able to get the threads deleted AND the poster zotted. I was so disheartened, I stopped donating for a bit in protest. It was completely uncalled for as what she posted was no worse than many of the Roman Catholic threads that criticize Protestants that STILL find their way here.
For a religion that boasts of its longevity, strength and exclusivity, you would think they could tolerate some disagreement as well as be able to defend their beliefs without calling others "haters", "anti-Catholics" and insulting. I'd be curious to see how their donations match up against the non-Cath's.
Why are you being so irrational?
No it was just a statement of fact.
It’s time to stop the false accusations concerning my posts.
Reading comprehension should be practiced before you post any more false interpretations of my comment.
Dang LC! Looks like someone has a “thing” for you. ;o)
No false interpretations, just quoting your own words.
It's a good thing Paul didn't have the "caucus" thread protection while he was advancing the Gospel!
I grew up in Buffalo, and was born and raised in the Catholic church in a Catholic family which included priests and nuns.
Buffalo is Catholicism on steroids and it’s not a pretty picture.
Not to mention that virtually every Catholic there votes liberal.
And when directly asked why they voted for pro abortion democratic candidates in light of the church’s teachings, each and every one of them responded with *Because the dems are for the poor.*
And these were active Catholics who attended mass whenever they could and were very active in their parishes, not the twice a year cafeteria Catholic crowd.
Waiting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.