Posted on 07/08/2018 10:03:40 AM PDT by Luircin
Then what are you?
Stop trying to dance around the subject and provide me sources.
Or are you telling me that Leo X was a GOOD Pope and you approve of his actions?
Keep talking.
Well?
Was Leo X a bad pope or not?
And if so, why do you think that you’re so special as to be allowed to reject bad popes, but young Catholic doctor Luther isn’t?
Autocorrect does not correct to non-existent words.
What am i!?
I am a believer in the Word Made Flesh. The Way, Truth and Life.
And Rome has counterfeited the Way,Truth and Life.
The source I use is the bible.
And the amazing thing is I was once blind,but now I see and what I see is so very opposite what the world sees.
And someday, all will be able to see and be cured of their blindness, deafness,dumbness.
It will ultimately come when Satan and his lies are removed but many will be bessed to see before then.
Again,For His glory!
1: I’m sorry you can’t read a dictionary.
2: Stop trying to change the subject.
Was Leo X a bad Pope or not?
Right. Drop the flowery words and tell me what your denomination/organization calls itself.
I don’t belong to a denomination/organization. Babylon is not for me.
Between you and Luther??
So you don’t have communion with ANY other believers?
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on Earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and baptism and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the gospel of Christ or his Church but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their consciencethose too may achieve eternal salvation. "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men" (CCC 846-48)
More like:
So,according to hints in scripture musings of delchiante...
Some people just don't WANT to be pleased.
*********
--Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)
This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the gospel of Christ or his Church but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their consciencethose too may achieve eternal salvation.
#################
That's a pretty big change in doctrine....for the group that claims to have not changed.
We could comment on the false teachings as well, but there are a lot in both sections.
The only thing important in the whole world to some people is the calendar they use.
God tells us this. HE isn't worried about what we observe and what we don't.
Romans 14:1-9 As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions. One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him. Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike. Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind. The one who observes the day, observes it in honor of the Lord. The one who eats, eats in honor of the Lord, since he gives thanks to God, while the one who abstains, abstains in honor of the Lord and gives thanks to God. For none of us lives to himself, and none of us dies to himself. For if we live, we live to the Lord, and if we die, we die to the Lord. So then, whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord both of the dead and of the living.
Colossians 2:16-23 Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. Let no one disqualify you, insisting on asceticism and worship of angels, going on in detail about visions, puffed up without reason by his sensuous mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom the whole body, nourished and knit together through its joints and ligaments, grows with a growth that is from God.
If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch (referring to things that all perish as they are used)according to human precepts and teachings? These have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion and asceticism and severity to the body, but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh.
Why not answer Luircin’s question?
If Leo X was your pope today, would you reject him or not?
Do you think it’s an accident that physical Israel was led to stay ‘about 2,000 cubits’ from the ark of the covenant?
Now judaim has no clue why. But those who have the Son, have the New Testamemt record that gives us that exact ‘about 2,000’ figure again. And spiritual Israel is following the same pattern as physical Israel.
Demon possessed swine is not an attractive way to describe the years since His resurrection, but that’s what the world has seen.
Only those who have have the Son and are alive about 2,000 years from His resurrection, can even hope to see it.
But it happens with the about 3,000 in Exodus and Acts 2 as well.
Only those with the Son can hope to see His plan and the patterns He was showing Israel. Lots of mysteries and hints in the scriptures boatbums.
Ask,seek and knock.
If He leads someone to see how the cup that is in Rome and her daughters is a cup from Satan, that communion isn’t one to partake in.
1 Cor 10:21
I have no idea which side of Rome or her daughters you are on.
But the daughters need Rome more than they know.
So does Judaism and Islam.
This is a roman led, Satan led world and Satan uses Judeo Christianity as influential powers and principalities to peddle his lies, that can’t be seen as lies, because it just ‘is what it is’.
I learned from our Savior that I needed Rome more than I knew too, even though I was never a Roman Catholic.
Just born under roman bondage like we all are.
I heard the call to come out after my ears were unplugged and the scales fell from my blind eyes.
Where does one go if what the world sells are based on Satan’s inherited lies?
Only one place to go-to the Way, Truth and the Life- and Rome doesn’t have that.
They don’t have the Word Made Flesh.
Their teachings and the bible tell me so.
Now, that should only be a Rome problem.
But it seems more and more of her daughters would take offense to a statement like that because if Rome and her lies really fall,down goes the whole lot of inherited lies.
For His Glory!
You still make no sense.
Do you worship with other people? What do you call yourself? Do you have any statement of faith other than bizarre ramblings about whores and stabbing and stabbing whores who stab whores?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.