Posted on 07/08/2018 10:03:40 AM PDT by Luircin
So why are you here then?
I believe it was you complaining about my participation.
Right, I’m going to cut the snark now.
Lay off trying to hijack the thread.
It’s my thread; where else should I be?
That's the point, now isn't it? You're complaining about hijacking, etc. You should have made it a caucus thread the truth is bothersome.
1: I can’t make it a caucus thread since it mentions the Reformation, which in itself involves Rome.
2: Even if I could, I wouldn’t. I wanted to see how many Roman Catholics would actually read the article and respond to it without tantrum-throwing.
Nothing is settled.
Says the willing participant. If you think a post is a hijack, the best thing you can do is not respond, or else you are a willing participant in what you are complaining against.
Okay, then don’t complain when I call you Romanists when you call us heretics.
Did you read the article or not?
Yet you claim "tantrum" on every Catholic post. Go figure.
I calls ‘em as I sees ‘em.
Considering the fact that you didn’t read the article and are complaining about me using far milder language than you do instead of doing so, sounds like a tantrum to me.
Prove me wrong.
That's what I'm recommending - you should stick to caucus threads or expect your feelings might get hurt.
tantrum-throwing.
Has all been yours.
What makes you think I didn’t read the article?
Why do you make stuff up about what I have and have not read?
Tantrum?
Have you read the article or not?
Thank you for being a part of this little informal study of mine.
Not a single FRoman so far has read and engaged with the article I’ve posted in the comment section.
Certainly tells you a lot, when on Catholic-posted threads, the Prots actually read and respond to the articles posted, with quotes from both the Bible and the article in order to dispute or agree with it.
Kinda sad that the proponents of the ‘One True Church’ can’t defend their own faith.
And here you were calling it hijacking the whole time. How deceptive.
Not a single FRoman so far has read and engaged with the article I’ve posted in the comment section.
Read and engaged appropriately. This article has been around for a while by the way.
on Catholic-posted threads, the Prots actually read and respond to the articles posted, with quotes from both the Bible and the article in order to dispute or agree with it.
Don't deceive yourself. Try reading some of them some time and you'll see what I mean.
Kinda sad that the proponents of the ‘One True Church’ can’t defend their own faith.
Keep on believing your own false conclusions. Does it make you feel better about yourself?
By the way, since you're sidetracking, are you interested in what they found out about what Martin Luther ate? It's pretty interesting really, and surprisingly it doesn't involve a diet of worms.
As spittle by the classless one. Which face will we get next? The bless you or the ...
Nah, I’m done with you.
Gave you every chance to read the article, every chance to engage.
You refused.
Thank you for showing us your true nature.
Goodnight.
Do you even know what you post? You don't make sense.
Come in from the fringe.
Oh they consider insults and off color posts to be defending ‘their faith’. What does that tell you about their source spiritual impetus?... Don’t answer that. The Romanist will tattle to the moderator and at the very least have the post pull, but more likely have the thread pulled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.