20-City Anti-Islam Rally Puts Mosques Across U.S. on High Alert

To: Albion Wilde

Although protests are protected under the 1st Amendment, under the heading of free assembly.

61 posted on 10/12/2015 3:57:43 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)

I meant one rally. We have way too many mosques in Houston too.

62 posted on 10/12/2015 6:00:11 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Rick Chollett for President!)

NEVER, NEVER, NEVER trust a Muslim ! ! !

Muslims are well know for lying about their faith.

MUSLIMS are allowed to LIE and deceive NON MUSLIMS, if it benefits or protects ISLAM. Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie. Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves." Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway. Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers. Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" Qur'an (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths" Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21) Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose. Posted by Atheist

For a better understanding of the issue, read HISTORY of Mohammed ( spelled variously; Mahomet, Muhammed, Mehmet, etc. ).

So ...I SAY AGAIN,

NEVER

! ! !

And that INCLUDES the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF ! ! !

63 posted on 10/12/2015 9:28:15 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)

Although protests are protected under the 1st Amendment, under the heading of free assembly.

Of course. That's why the ghouls with the "Baby Killer" and "Murderer" signs and cardboard caskets were permitted to stand on the public sidewalk outside Walter Reed in front of the distraught family members who had just flown in to see their combat-wounded loved one with limbs blown off, blinded, deafened, burned or disfigured. And why the ghouls from Westboro Baptist Church are permitted to scarify the mourners at military funerals. It is their right.

But just because someone can do something doesn't mean they should do it. And I don't believe that picketing individual mosques is an effective protest, when the people in the mosques are utterly powerless to change things, since if they leave their faith, they can be honor killed; and if their leaders tell them to do something, they have to do it. The power behind Islamization lies with the white and black elites in government, universities and media. Just sayin.'

64 posted on 10/12/2015 9:37:16 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)

To: Albion Wilde

And also, citing the legal protections in regards to the USA Constitution, which in the 1st Amendment, is not there to protect what is popular, but also unpopular also.

65 posted on 10/12/2015 9:39:33 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)

Correction:

“But also unpopular speech.”

66 posted on 10/12/2015 9:40:37 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)

Two of the most beautiful buildings ever built

Before the mohammedan filth destroyed them, I could look at them and know that once, many years ago ... a man ... an artist ... had strung a wire between them, and walked the windy void.

67 posted on 10/12/2015 9:45:11 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")

I have seen the first three ...

68 posted on 10/12/2015 9:46:12 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")

It’s not a question of popularity or unpopularity. Hard to imagine why you are defending ineffectual and unnecessarily dangerous activities that may even be instigated by the lslam-defenders themselves to make the protesters look hateful, instead of encouraging lawful protesters to aim at the target instead of at the woods behind the target.

69 posted on 10/12/2015 9:54:51 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)

To: Albion Wilde

Even if the subject is not popular or supported, like it or not, and this is from the perspective of the Constitution, it is still protected speed. Do I support all the time, NO, but in the eyes of the Constitution it is still legit.

70 posted on 10/12/2015 11:17:14 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)

No one is arguing with you there. No one has been arguing with their right, just their waste of effort and bad taste in doing so. OK?

71 posted on 10/12/2015 2:25:02 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

72 posted on 10/13/2015 9:13:53 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794