Famous Homosexual Serves as Lector During Pope Francis’ NYC Mass

Church Militant ^ | September 26, 2015 | Church Militant

[NetAddicted]

I’m looney. I swear I posted this, before you. I only posted the first paragraph, because that’s all my iPad will copy. I remember typing the title. I had left the article open on my iPad, so I could post it, and I closed it, after I posted it. I used two keywords: homosexualagenda and popefrancis.
I know I did the above, but I can’t find the post. I remember looking at it, after I posted it, and I was waiting for comments. Then. I got busy at something else. Just came back to FR, and have no idea what happened. Oh, well.

[NetAddicted]

Daily Show.

[NetAddicted]

Their foolish hearts were darkened: homosexuals are on the dark side. They are Satanic.

[NetAddicted]

Why do they even care about Pope Francis’ opinion?

[vpintheak]

Time for a Reformation! Again!

[piusv]

Before people jump to irrational conclusions, we must keep in mind that it is beyond improbable that Pope Francis even knew Mo Rocca's name let alone that he was a famous homosexual. After all, Pope Francis admitted in an interview that he gave up watching television in 1990 and he greatly struggles with the english language.

LOL. Of course he didn't. /s

[piusv]

At the end of the day, it is Cdl. Dolan who must take ultimate responsibility for approving the decision to have Rocca as lector, and for failing to vet those people who publicly appeared at the Mass alongside Pope Francis.

Says "It's-Never-Francis'-Fault-Church Militant".

[onedoug]

Well, at least he was fabu...uh, famous.

[Slyfox]

Why do they even care about Pope Francis’ opinion?

If the left can convince people of the the Pope's "Climate Changitis" and convince people he is a lefty, then by osmosis they will be able to convince people that all that pro-life "crap" he spouts does not mean anything at all.

The truth is when Francis speaks on climate change he either precedes it or puts in bold italics that human life at all stages of development must be respected.

Have you heard anyone outside of Catholic media like EWTN or maybe the occasional FOX News contributor refer to his pro-life stance?

Nope. It is climate change and "well, maybe the Pope will also rethink his other positions."

They are taking advantage of the fact that he does not easily converse in English to "frame his message for him."

The gays nuns and the homosexual marriage crowd are convinced that since they already have Obama, all they need is to re-fashion the Pope into another mouthpiece, then their utopia will be realized.

That is my short answer.