Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

6 pitfalls that trick you into thinking you don't love your spouse
Jewish World Review ^ | August 12, 2015 | Erika Strassburger Borba

Posted on 08/13/2015 9:27:31 PM PDT by imardmd1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: imardmd1

Uh-h-h-h-h


What I mean is that you no longer see them as a jerk. You see them as a flawed human being, as are we all.

I’ve said, since my first wife dumped me 18 years ago after 20 years of marriage that every single person on the planet is loveable AND hateable, depending on what attributes of theirs are your primary focus. And if you focus on their positives you are “friend”, and when you focus on their negatives you are “foe”.

When you DECIDE to marry someone, you ACTIVELY love them and you have committed to, “until death do us part” be their “friend”. When a person DECIDES to divorce someone, they no longer love the person, not because the person no longer deserves it - they never did. They have DECIDED to stop loving them. They have DECIDED to focus on the negatives. They have become their “foe”.

Every single married person on the planet has given their spouse reason, no matter how small, to not love them, but adult people of character and integrity honor their commitment to DECIDE to ACTIVELY love thier spouse. And the interesting thing is that when it is active, it is surprisingly easy and you WANT to make them happy - and take joy in it - even if you are married to what many would consider a brute or oaf of a man or a fat slob of a woman who mostly watches soaps and eats bon-bons.

But when you don’t have character and integrity, and you have married someone because you thought they would make YOU happy, eventually you blame them for your unhappiness, which always comes, if only fleeting. And then you DECIDE, incrementally, to no longer love them.

And the next thing you know, you’re calling a divorce attorney because your good-for-nothing spouse won’t say “how high” every time you say jump.

I love what a woman I worked with who was being divorced by her husband said: “I take responsibility for some of the problems in my marriage, but I am not responsible for the divorce. Why? Because I didn’t do it.”

Love is a decision.

Love is an action.


41 posted on 08/15/2015 5:15:41 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Good God, the insanity is overwhelming. You love your children. Perfectly yes/no, maybe and almost, or close maybe. The perfection of marriage is a gift, seldom granted. The attempt at sanity, of one on one love, is beyond all human ability. Men and women, unless severely tethered by moral perfection- are not made to live together. Sorry, this is a fact.


42 posted on 08/15/2015 5:28:52 AM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
The article is about marriage, and about keeping that covenant of union between one man and one woman in force. Though "love" in all its forms--eros, philathea, agape--is explicitly and implicitly a part of the oath of performance, marital unity is a commitment to be sustained while both be alive, until death of one terminates it, sealed with an oath.

The (A) actions of marital "love" are based on the (B) belief that keeping the pledge will (C) consequently be beneficial to the object of one's love as well as oneself. A, B, C.

Decision/action is only a part of this formula that defines "love," and incorporating more elements in your explanatory statements shows that your initial premise lacks them.

This is just an observation on your premises, not an attempt to start an argument over what "love" is.

43 posted on 08/15/2015 10:59:52 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

This is just an observation on your premises, not an attempt to start an argument over what “love” is.


No problem. I was trying to be brief and demonstrated in my attempt why twitter is dumb. You can’t get complex points across in just a few sentences.

i.e. I agree with everything you said.


44 posted on 08/15/2015 12:49:37 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RedHeeler
Sorry, this is a fact.

With all due respect, this is not a fact. It is a human opinion, out of atheistic concepts. The Biblical truth is that men and women were created to live together as one being, to serve, protect, and sustain each other; and to propagate the race in a preserving environment. That is a survival fact.

45 posted on 08/15/2015 1:27:24 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
i.e. I agree with everything you said.

And your expansion brought out the character of what charitable "love" consists of, without which no satisfactory relationship can continue, and with which I also agree. Others reading your comments will be edified and comforted.

46 posted on 08/15/2015 1:39:00 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson