What is constantly attempted is trying to equate this to racial discrimination, in which a person is not served due to his skin color, nationality, etc., but which is an invalid analogy. The florist is not refusing to serve a customer because they are homosexual, but because they want her to help celebrate an immoral homosexual act.
A black florist cannot legally refuse to serve a communist member, but should be allowed to refuse to serve one if he wanted an arrangement for a celebration of Lenin’s birthday.
But as the gov. itself sanctions immorality, here you have the weakness of democracy, which depends upon a populace which is largely controlled enough from within, by God and conscience reflecting basic Biblical morality, so that they need not be much controlled from without by a vast controlling government, and which voters have the moral sense and wisdom to elect leaders who themselves are thus controlled.
For gov. itself must be government, and the people choose what leaders it consists of.
• ...we have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. (From a letter Adams wrote on 11 October 1798 to the officers of the First Brigade, Third Division, of the Massachusetts Militia).ion of the Militia of Massachusetts,” October 11, 1798) More: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Quotes_compare.html
Homosexual agenda always pushing pushing pushing. They could probably get those flowers in plenty of places, but chose this guy just to push their agenda even further and scare other businesses. They know their actions are repugnant, but their psychological disease is to the need for everyone to applaud their known pervasion and to play lip service to how great their perversion is.