Posted on 11/30/2011 5:18:31 AM PST by Saundra Duffy
I wear a simple James Avery cross that I’ve worn for 35 years. I rarely take it off, but it’s not because I think it protects me from harm or would make God mad. It is, for me, a symbol of the sacrifice that bought me and gave me eternal life. It is also, frankly, advertising: I have had a number of conversations about Christ begin after someone remarked on the cross I wear.
I have great trouble equating a symbol of the instrument of my Savior’s torture and death standing empty because He is risen, with a garment that is completely unsupported by Scripture - that actually hearkens back to when “obey the rules” was what people thought made them right with God. Doesn’t mean I don’t love Mormons - in fact, I’ve only ever met one Mormon I didn’t like, and all the Mormons I know in the Air Force are upstanding examples of what it means to serve. People can be good citizens and good neighbors and still be misled.
Colonel, USAFR
“I know that Jesus Christ is my Savior. I am not ignorant of His Infinite Atonement for me and for all mankind. I love Him.”
Amen. So strip the rest of the trappings out as unnecessary distractions.
Well for the Jews, wearing the tzitzit is commanded in Deuteronomy 22:12: “You shall make yourself twisted threads, on the four corners of your garment with which you cover yourself.”
Personally, if I were Jewish, I would do what is commanded.
For the Mormon, this is from the article...
“Garments are a symbolic gesture of the promises that Mormons have made to God”
Perhaps some may have a problem with this. It isn’t a “right with God” situation from what I can see, but rather a remembrance of what one vowed. More like a wedding ring or a pledge pin. It’s a personal devotion and should not be looked down upon just because I don’t follow it.
Afterall, it isn’t something that one puts out there for everyone to see.
Amen to your post.
I got no problem with the under garments and some friends explained what wearing them meant in their lives.
My friend just passed away and I don’t step up to open caskets but several friends talked about the apron that was placed on her.
Perhaps you could post an article explaining burial rituals?
Thnx.
ROFLOL!!!!
“Perhaps some may have a problem with this. It isnt a ‘right with God’ situation from what I can see, but rather a remembrance of what one vowed. More like a wedding ring or a pledge pin. Its a personal devotion and should not be looked down upon just because I dont follow it.
Afterall, it isnt something that one puts out there for everyone to see.”
Thank you.
“So strip the rest of the trappings out as unnecessary distractions.”
No thanks. They mean something very sacred to me.
Interesting for a couple reasons.....
Apparently you know....ALL Christians. Yeah right!!!! LOL!!!
And secondly....what about mormons?
I think you've slipped up here....You all want to be called Christians. But you don't think of yourselves as Christian.
Of course...I've known that for decades. But it's just interesting to see you admit it....unintentionally.
Perhaps it's because mormon leaders and members have "bashed" Christians and Christianity since the very founding of the mormon church.
---------------------------------------
Well Saundra..do you believe the following:
1) The Bible is the inspired word of God
2) Mormonism is in conflict with historic Christianity
3) It is truth that sets us free (John 8:32)
Ten important questions that need answers (please check all quotes to be sure they are correct):
1) Joseph Smith said: ..the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book. (Introduction to Book of Mormon). What are these precepts?
2) Why do the doctrines in the Book of Mormon conflict with some of the doctrines in the D&C? (i.e. Jacob 2:23-28 and D&C 132:38-39)
3) Why would a true prophet of God claim: I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. History of the Church, Vol.6, p.408-409).
4) Why did Mormonism practice blood atonement and Utah have the death penalty by firing squad for many years? (Doctrines of Salvation, Vol.1, p.136)
5) Why are some sins not covered by the blood of Jesus? (Journal of Discourses, Vol.3, p.247; Vol.4, p.219; Doctrines of Salvation, Vol.1, p.133-134)
6) How could God, the Creator, have been equal to His creation by being at one time a mere man? (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.345-346)
7) Is it necessary to have the passport of Joseph Smith in order to enter the celestial kingdom of God? (Journal of Discourses, Vol.7, p.289)
8) Is it true that Heavenly Father has a father, a grandfather, etc.? (The Seer, p.132)
9) Can anyone obtain the celestial kingdom without being perfect? (Book of Mormon Student Manual, p.303)
10) How could the law of man override the law of God in regards to polygamy? (Journal of Discourses, Vol.11, p.269)
Gee..is that kind of like the way no one is allowed into a mormon temple without being found "worthy"...even parents of a couple being married there? Shocking!
I didn’t read it in the article you posted but is it OK to remove the garment when showering? They only mention swimming, using the bathroom and intimacy. Does the bathroom part also mean showers?
Well, G_D was pretty specific in what you had to wear in order to get into the Holy of Holys.
I find that the belief that God is actually "bound" by some manmade rituals in a mormon temple to be ridiculous. In order to take part in these rituals, one must be found "by men" to be worthy.
If God wanted to be bound to a covenant with man, He wouldn't require the covenant to be something that is fashioned from the mind/hand of man. He could simply use his Heavenly ZOT!
(I borrowed that from another more humorous and brilliant FReeper)
‘One of the reasons I became an Atheist was seeing the constant bickering among religious people about who was absolutely right and who was absolutely wrong. So I long ago came to the conclusion that either they are all right or none of them are right. ;
I think you aren’t being totally logical here. They can’t ALL be right, some having diametrically opposed views. There is the possibility, logically, that they may all be wrong. But you leave out the possibility that ONE of them is right.
Those restrictions were for the priests because they alone were allowed access to the Holy of Holys. Christians hold that those restrictions of attire and access were lifted when the veil of the temple was torn at the cruxification of Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:51). It was part of the shadow system which was cast aside with the arrival of the Messiah who was the reality behind those shadows.
The only attire I need to approach God's throne is the blood of Christ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.