Skip to comments.
Is the Reformation Over? by R.C. Sproul
Ligonier ^
| Oct. 31, 2011
| RC Sproul
Posted on 11/03/2011 7:39:32 AM PDT by fishtank
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Best quote from the article:
"At the moment the Roman Catholic Church condemned the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone, she denied the gospel and ceased to be a legitimate church, regardless of all the rest of her affirmations of Christian orthodoxy. To embrace her as an authentic church while she continues to repudiate the biblical doctrine of salvation is a fatal attribution. Were living in a time where theological conflict is considered politically incorrect, but to declare peace when there is no peace is to betray the heart and soul of the gospel."
1
posted on
11/03/2011 7:39:33 AM PDT
by
fishtank
To: Alex Murphy
2
posted on
11/03/2011 7:39:55 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
3
posted on
11/03/2011 7:43:03 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
4
posted on
11/03/2011 7:43:14 AM PDT
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: fishtank
5
posted on
11/03/2011 7:47:57 AM PDT
by
rzman21
To: fishtank
(I John 3:4). Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
To: fishtank
"At the moment the Roman Catholic Church condemned the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone, she denied the gospel and ceased to be a legitimate church, regardless of all the rest of her affirmations of Christian orthodoxy. To embrace her as an authentic church while she continues to repudiate the biblical doctrine of salvation is a fatal attribution. Were living in a time where theological conflict is considered politically incorrect, but to declare peace when there is no peace is to betray the heart and soul of the gospel." Well said, R.C. Sproul.
7
posted on
11/03/2011 8:02:10 AM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2703506/posts?page=518#518)
To: Alex Murphy; fishtank
AMEN! Now can we quote this without being accused of inciting "hate" speech?
R.C. Sproul: God Bless you.
8
posted on
11/03/2011 8:05:44 AM PDT
by
smvoice
(Who the *#@! is Ivo of Chatre & why am I being accused of not linking to his quote?)
To: fishtank
I like listening to Sproll, he is intellectually challenging, learn a lot from him. But I also Love
J Vernon McGee
9
posted on
11/03/2011 8:12:16 AM PDT
by
mel
(There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
To: fishtank
He lists the study guide in PDF version on website.
10
posted on
11/03/2011 8:22:17 AM PDT
by
mel
(There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
To: smvoice
"Now can we quote this without being accused of inciting "hate" speech?" What constitutes "hate" speech is the collective message in statements that one hates the Catholic Church and why. When the message is hateful it is not necessary to characterize it as hate speech nor effective to deny it.
11
posted on
11/03/2011 8:30:07 AM PDT
by
Natural Law
(Transubstantiation - Change we can believe in.)
To: Natural Law
Sorta like “I would bury the Statue of Liberty in my yard to sell my house if I lived next to you”? Oh, wait I get what you’re saying..if it concerns the CATHOLIC CHURCH, it is “hate speech”. Everything else is open season?
12
posted on
11/03/2011 8:36:52 AM PDT
by
smvoice
(Who the *#@! is Ivo of Chatre & why am I being accused of not linking to his quote?)
To: fishtank
the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone That would be the "biblical doctrine" rejected in James 2:24?
13
posted on
11/03/2011 8:49:42 AM PDT
by
Campion
("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies when they become fashions." -- GKC)
To: Campion
he biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone
That would be the “biblical doctrine” rejected in James 2:24?
ME: that doesnt worry them, they just reinterpret james to fit the man-made faith alone doctrine.....come on, why do you think that luther tried to toss that book? even he knew...but since they would let him, they had to, and to this day, after to insist on a different interpretation of the plain obvious meaning of that text from James....
so the ‘reformation’ will continue as the next ‘pastor’ will grab his bible and insist his version of whatever vital doctrine is the correct one, despite the ‘pastor’ up the street with his bible saying the exact opposite on the same doctrine, etc, etc, etc, and then they will break off to another little ‘bible only ‘ church, and so it goes....
To: raygunfan; Campion
Just curious, of which tribe do you two belong?
15
posted on
11/03/2011 8:59:07 AM PDT
by
smvoice
(Who the *#@! is Ivo of Chatre & why am I being accused of not linking to his quote?)
To: Campion
Nonsense. Or, on the day you stand before the Lord, take a list of your ood works and personal works and tell him “James 2:24.” You want to take that chance?
16
posted on
11/03/2011 9:08:19 AM PDT
by
righttackle44
(. The J-school graduates who did)
To: smvoice
"I would bury the Statue of Liberty in my yard to sell my house if I lived next to you? Ask you neighbors. It has nothing to do with your church.
17
posted on
11/03/2011 9:11:32 AM PDT
by
Natural Law
(Transubstantiation - Change we can believe in.)
To: smvoice
>>Oh, wait I get what youre saying..if it concerns the CATHOLIC CHURCH, it is hate speech. Everything else is open season?<<
Interesting how that works.
To: fishtank
“The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself” (Ezekiel 18:20
To: Campion
"That would be the "biblical doctrine" rejected in James 2:24?"
It would be the same James who accepted this "biblical doctrine" at the cousel of Jerusalem.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson