Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reformation Sunday 2011: How Would Protestants Know When to Return?
Called to Communion ^ | 10/29/11 | Bryan Cross

Posted on 11/03/2011 7:29:48 AM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last
To: marshmallow

You should be ashamed at yourself for posting this. Ask for it to be taken down.


61 posted on 11/03/2011 11:34:17 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

I would be as offend if someone posted a Catholic bashing article.


62 posted on 11/03/2011 11:35:47 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“What do we have to do to put your in this car today?” Puddy to Jerry.


63 posted on 11/03/2011 11:38:05 AM PDT by smvoice (Who the *#@! is Ivo of Chatre & why am I being accused of not linking to his quote?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I've asked twice for you to identify the specific problem here. In particular you've called it a "slander". I invite you to explain why this term applies to this article.

I think it's an excellent article which raises some pertinent questions which few if any have attempted to address.

Be my guest.

64 posted on 11/03/2011 11:38:22 AM PDT by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
It slanders God, and verges on the unforgivable sin, to assert that the Holy Spirit boycotts Protestants.

How would I as a Protestant know when to return?

I've twice asked you to retract this. Maybe if you pray about it first.

65 posted on 11/03/2011 11:40:49 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Don't play the martyr here. A Catholic provoked this by printing this slander. It was a deliberate attempt to start a fight. Which is a real shame.

ROFL!! Protestants NEVER do that. /exrreme dreipping sarcasm

66 posted on 11/03/2011 11:41:55 AM PDT by Judith Anne (HolyMary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: patlin
patlin, your story is interesting and plausible. As for the details, first paragraph since I'm dispensational I take the whole Bible seriously and think it unfortunate the first 3/4 of the Word is considered “Old”.

Moving on though, you set up this scenario of a power struggle Shammai/Hillel, but according to my Bible Jesus had very few friends (Jew or Gentile) at the end. If I say that sinful man nailed Jesus to the cross, I'm on solid Biblical ground. If I say it was an intermurial rivalry, I have to stray from the Scriptures.

Going back to my question asking why Catholics are so obsessed with regaining that which was lost in 1517. It is interesting the answers catholics themselves give. It is also interesting how they (catholics) react when say one of the protestant mainlines decide to have a friendly chat with Rome. I say this in that the small percentage of protestants who are truly Biblical in living their faith have the one thing catholics and liberal protestants will never have.

My wife's great aunt is 93 years old which means in her case she was sprinkled by a Roman Catholic priest 93 years ago, she has put in literally countless hours of labor for her church and is leaving her estate to (I think) the Sisters of Mercy and yet she is not in any way, shape or form prepared for that great getting up day. This says more to me about the RCC than any well written argument or counterargument.

67 posted on 11/03/2011 11:43:34 AM PDT by fatboy (This protestant will have no part in the ecumenical movement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DManA
It slanders God, and verges on the unforgivable sin, to assert that the Holy Spirit boycotts Protestants.

OK, now we're getting somewhere.

Where?

Cut and paste the offending words.

68 posted on 11/03/2011 11:43:49 AM PDT by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: DManA

As I said, I don’t understand any of these offenses.


69 posted on 11/03/2011 11:47:11 AM PDT by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Such bitterness. That’s why it was such a mistake to post this article.


70 posted on 11/03/2011 11:53:48 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Can everyone just take a deep breath and actually think about this for a minute?

I hold out little hope, much of the ignorance here on the FR religious forum seems to be the very definition of invincible.

71 posted on 11/03/2011 11:54:21 AM PDT by conservonator (God between us and the devil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Not a good sign when you can’t even be bothered to read my post.


72 posted on 11/03/2011 11:54:51 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Kindly expand on that........

Which post?

73 posted on 11/03/2011 11:56:34 AM PDT by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DManA
"You stand in ignorance."

Exactly what the Pharisees of old said.

74 posted on 11/03/2011 11:57:11 AM PDT by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Others don't take the same tack I do. (OMG!)

No, nothing at all shameful in your piece BUT in begs the question of what to do with all those folks out there who see it totally differently ~ like they wonder when you will join them.

That, BTW, is the operative condition at the end of the Thirty Years War ~ which rapidly spun out of control as the new concept of the independent nation state with full authority over every matter of life took hold and the old order just flat out disappeared.

From that point on if there was a need for a church to sit above the nation, they got their church and it was nobody else's business. It wasn't always the Roman Catholic church that won the franchise from that point on. Even that age ended sometime in the 1800s and Empire took center stage for Europeans.

The part I haven't figured out is how the Orthodox in Russia gave way to the Baptists and Mennonites~ eventually I'll read enough of their history to see how that idea took hold at the village level but for the moment I'll just remain blissfully unaware of how it happened.

Poland is another issue that's strange. It was Catholic. Protestants conquered it. It remained Catholic. No one cared. Very strange.

75 posted on 11/03/2011 11:57:42 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DManA

My so-called “bitterness” waa in response to your mind-reading comment:

Don’t play the martyr here. A Catholic provoked this by printing this slander. It was a deliberate attempt to start a fight. Which is a real shame.

How do you know what was in the OP’s mind when s/he posted it? Why can’t you just respond to the article? Why do you call it slander? Why should I not be annoyed with your unpleasant comments? Are Catholics simply supposed to agree with YOUR slander?


76 posted on 11/03/2011 12:01:33 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HolyMary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"You are also about a century early with the major massacre"

No, I got the exact year correct for the massacre of the Waldensians by the Catholic Church at Merindol (1545). The ground for this was laid in 1526 at the Synod of Laus where the Waldensians agreed to investigate the protestant movement. In 1532, after meeting with Swiss reformer William Farel the Waldensians adapted the beliefs of the Reformation Church. This prompted the bloody massacre by the Catholic Church.

77 posted on 11/03/2011 12:03:16 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DManA

My so-called “bitterness” waa in response to your mind-reading comment:

“Don’t play the martyr here. A Catholic provoked this by printing this slander. It was a deliberate attempt to start a fight. Which is a real shame.”

How do you know what was in the OP’s mind when s/he posted it? Why can’t you just respond to the article? Why do you call it slander? Why should I not be annoyed with your unpleasant comments? Are Catholics simply supposed to agree with YOUR slander?

>>>>Sorry, I forgot to put quotation marks around your sweet comment.


78 posted on 11/03/2011 12:03:16 PM PDT by Judith Anne (HolyMary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Several responses to your post, not one straight answer. Of course you know as well as they do that the answer ABC, Anything But Catholic. Because you know that the OPC and the Freewill Baptists share exactly the same beliefs, except for a common understanding of grace and really, who needs grace?


79 posted on 11/03/2011 12:03:25 PM PDT by conservonator (God between us and the devil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Catholics are supposed to be courteous and loving to others. Just like Protestants. Posting this slander was not an act of love.


80 posted on 11/03/2011 12:03:55 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson