Posted on 10/02/2010 7:40:13 AM PDT by restornu
Having been numbered among the avidly anti-Mormon-cult crowd, he was miraculously converted to the gospel according to Joseph Smith upon reading the Book of Mormon.
He joined the LDS church for a few years but presently is disassociated so as to not be unfettered in his ministry. Yet he retains his commitment to the restoration gospel, though certainly not ignorant of the saints’ shortcomings in regard to their magnificent destiny.
His primary gift and mission in life seems to be to stir the coals of revival among the charismatic-inclined who are numbered among the various restoration movements. Hence his residence in Independence,
Missouri. God bless you, Lynn.
Sterling D. Allan
November 1, 2000
Updated Jan. 25, 2005
This is an Ecumenical thread!
Here is his web site: http://www.greaterthings.com/Ridenhour/index.html
I am willing--in fact eager--to disavow the bad judgment and evil acts of my ancestors and everybody else--but I am not responsible for the misdeeds of anyone but myself.
Yes, I accept full responsibility for my own misdeeds, and I apologize to all concerned for them. But I have no apologies to make for anyone but myself.
All this "apology" foolishness is just more sloppy logic from the Left:
They're going to "apologize" for the misdeed of everybody they can think of-- What they really want to do is disavow misdeeds and evil. Good! Do so.
They also want to acknowledge "hate crimes"--as though they are somehow worse than other crimes--and the other crimes are what? "love crimes"?
Then, of course, there is Leftists' (for the most part intentional) misconception that Islam is a race.
They make these confusions partly because it suits their purpose, partly because they're stupid, and partly because their Decadence interferes with their logic and clarity.
One of the worst things about the Decadence that has infected Western Civilization like the Black Plague--and promises to be far more deadly--is its disregard for logic, clarity, and honesty.
In fact, the scorn of truth is the deadliest and most fundamental--and the most odious--thing about this deadly Decadence.
Similarly, apologizing for the "sins" of ancestors who lived in different times and operated under different cultural understandings is useless. It happened. Was it morally right or wrong? We can analyze and discuss that.. and learn from their virtues and mistakes. But apologizing for it is an empty exercise.
I really don’t think his apology was so much about the action of others in his family as that he said, he was raised to be anti-Mormon and now he is no longer and confession is good for the soul to clear the air!
We will all be judge for our individual actions in life not of what others are did or doing!
The article would have been more honest to say he is a FORMER Southern Baptist. As a Southern Baptist, I’d object pretty strongly to a SBC pastor supporting the LDS church.
His apology was misplaced, regardless. One, you cannot apologize for another person, particularly one you never met. And two, the Mormons were driven out for a reason, and it wasn’t religion. The LDS tended to vote for anyone their Prophet told them to, and as they increased in numbers, they became the deciding vote. The people of Missouri and later Illinois had to decide if they wanted to live in a democracy or theocracy, and they chose freedom.
Well, that certainly was heart felt. (roll eyes)
LDS is a non-Christian cult. A non-Christian cult is an organization that claims to be Christian while at the same time denying core teachings of Christianity. One such core teaching is that there is one God. Mormons teach that there are many gods and that human beings can become gods, create their own worlds, populate them and "save" them if necessary.
LDS isn't merely "different." It is a non-Christian religion that masquerades as a Christian religion, using Christian terminology, slogans, and some Christianesque ceremonies.
Tearful "apologies" do nothing to establish LDS as Christian any more than using Christian vocabulary.
I should repent for my own sins. I should not repent for the sins of others.
Man will be punished for his own sins, not for Adams transgression.
The apologies for others generally have other motives.
Jan. 24, 2005? Wow, you’re a little slow in getting your breaking news out.
Today, October 2, 2010 I apologize to all those people I have converted and baptized into Mormonism. As a youth I just obeyed the burning in the bosom.
Please forgive me. I made a terrible mistake.
“Having been numbered among the avidly anti-Mormon-cult crowd, he was miraculously converted to the gospel according to Joseph Smith upon reading the Book of Mormon. “
How in the world can this be considered the spirit of ecumenical posting when Restornu starts with this statement??
Oh I get it. It's a proselytizing thread
Oh, snap!
“Today, October 2, 2010 I apologize to all those people I have converted and baptized into Mormonism. As a youth I just obeyed the burning in the bosom. Please forgive me. I made a terrible mistake.”
As a representative of the non-lds (read: mormon) persuasion,
I humbly and thankfully accept your true repentance and
apology. May the souls you misled find the one true God.
I also apologize and repent for not speaking up more
loudly as I allowed white-shirted mormon missionaries
to pass by me on their bicycles. I should have intervened.
Please forgive me Utah Binger. One of them probably was
not you, but as a former mormon missionary, would you
accept my apology by proxy (on a dry basis with no rituals)?
[This event will be reported on FR in 5 years, according to
the standard of news reporting.]
ecumenically yours,
ampu
I do not believe in vicarious apologies.
Ridenhour was not even born when his ancestors persecuted the Mormons in Missouri. He took no part in the persecutions; he bears no personal responsibility for them. Therefore, his apology, however heartfelt and well-intentioned, is unnecessary.
The persecutors and the persecuted are long dead. We can learn from their history; we need not wallow in it.
He should apologize for saying that LDS isn’t a cult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.