Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intended Catholic Dictatorship
Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

Posted on 08/27/2010 11:45:13 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781-4,800 ... 15,821-15,828 next last
To: Mad Dawg; OLD REGGIE
It’s just a little ridiculous to suggest that JPII kept his disagreement with Islam to himself,...

I may have missed it, but I don't recall him expressing a disagreement with Islam. I do remember the kissing the koran. Kinda shows how important symbolism is doesn't it?

You know, Dante has Mohammad in the circle of heretics eternally tortured. It’s hard for me to imagine that this is not known in the lands which moan under their abominable yoke.

All the more reason to preach Christ Crucified not kiss a koran.

Obviously if he did he wouldn't be invited back, nor would any other popes for a long time. As another RC posted he was human and made a mistake. Maybe the same thing should be said about his fascination with Mary, he was human and made a mistake.

4,761 posted on 09/14/2010 3:41:36 PM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4675 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Paul is speaking of the same natural man that John speaks of. The natural man, the man "in the flesh" and not "in the spirit" cannot please God because "everything not of faith is sin." Only the spiritual man pleases God because when he looks at the spiritual man He sees Christ within.

I've supported every one of my posts with Scripture.

You, not so much.

And it isn't just "my Scripture." It's yours, too. Read it.

4,762 posted on 09/14/2010 4:21:44 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4751 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

Good points.


4,763 posted on 09/14/2010 4:31:15 PM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4677 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

HE MADE THAT ABUNDANTLY CLEAR WITH THE:

HE WHO DOES THE WILL OF THE FATHER IS MY MOTHER, BROTHER . . .


4,764 posted on 09/14/2010 4:32:24 PM PDT by Quix (PAPAL AGENT DESIGNEE: Resident Filth of non-Roman Catholics; RC AGENT DESIGNATED: "INSANE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4686 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE; Mad Dawg; Dr. Eckleburg; metmom; Quix; wmfights
Plus we know that God is no respecter of persons.And per the bible, Mary is just that, a humble Jewish girl who served as the means for Jesus to manifest as human.

Catholics have it backwards: the earth and everything in it, including humble Jewish girls, were created by Christ. Mary did not create Christ. She is nothing more than a human vehicle to give him humanity, andbeing God, he really didn't even have to do it that way if he chose no to.

He is eternal, he was begotten before creation, before the Plan of Salvation.

to make Mary into the Roman invention, she must have titles and a new theology invented.She must also be pre-existent, the reason for creation, etc. etc., the firstborn of every creature, the fused soul with the Holy Spirit. This makes her superior to everyone but God the Father, and she is pretty much equal to Him from what I can determine. His love and pathos is ignored,even though it is revealed to mankind in the scriptures, but her supposed love of mankind, which is the invention of Rome and of men, has become the new focal point.

4,765 posted on 09/14/2010 4:33:44 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4746 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Transubstantiation is disproved by Scripture.

amen... just as a priesthood is not scriptural, just as a celibate pastorate is not scriptural ...I could go on..but you already get it :)

4,766 posted on 09/14/2010 4:44:32 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4757 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

And so then, if she is all those high faluting things Rome says she is, then she was never human in the first place and they are denying Christ’s humanity, which leads to a whole nother can of worms, not necessarily the diet of


4,767 posted on 09/14/2010 4:46:24 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4765 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

We are created in God’s image, more than “flesh”.

And flesh and spirit and in the spirit, etc. etc. speak of our choices, our believing in Christ, our love, our response to God’s grace and love, which Jesus teaches us is perfect causing the rain to fall and the sun to shine on the just and unjust alike.

A far cry from Calvin’s doomed in the womb.

And, if you can’t see the scriptural references in my posts, so be it.

Proof texting is of little value and Calvinism, as I said, shows the extreme errors about God possible using sola scriptura.

You miss the forest for the trees. Jesus’s whole ministry refutes Calvin. Our everyday experience refutes “the illusion of free will.” No amount of proof texting can overcome that.


4,768 posted on 09/14/2010 4:52:09 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4762 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg; Quix; metmom; OLD REGGIE; wmfights; RnMomof7
Jesus’s whole ministry refutes Calvin.

lol, lol, no it proves Calvin. It's called the Plan of Salvation

4,769 posted on 09/14/2010 4:54:56 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4768 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE; Dr. Eckleburg; bkaycee
And the Councils of Hippo and Carthage were.........local Councils. The "approved" Catholic Bible Canon was set at the Council of Trent. Agreed?

No. :)

Local Councils are binding to local Churches.The Council of Carthage was binding to the Western (Latin) Church because it was accepted by the Bishop of Rome (Patriarch of the West). Thus the canon was set in the West by the 5th century. The Council of Trent merely reiterated the canon of the Council of Carthage centuries later.

4,770 posted on 09/14/2010 4:54:58 PM PDT by kosta50 (God is tired of repenting -- Jeremiah 15:6, KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4732 | View Replies]

To: metmom
If man did not have free will, God would not be constantly challenging us to choose.

Well put.

4,771 posted on 09/14/2010 4:56:08 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4760 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings
If Calvin is correct, Jesus's ministry is moot. A waste of God's breath.

the Plan of Salvation

Yeah. It's all over before you're born - you're born lucky or you burn. Great plan - if you're a pagan.

Lemme guess: you were born lucky.

4,772 posted on 09/14/2010 4:59:34 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4769 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Another Roman Catholic who knows better than the church fathers.

A Church father does not get to overrule the Consensus Patrum or the Magisterium,they humbly submit to the Church even if they have other thoughts. They don't run off and pridefully start a new religion like protestantism

4,773 posted on 09/14/2010 5:00:28 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4735 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Do you have a problem with Coloosians 1:15

For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

4,774 posted on 09/14/2010 5:03:48 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4772 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Dr. Eckleburg; metmom
The question was not did God love Paul, but did God force Paul to love him.

Jhn 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
Jhn 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

Jhn 6:36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
Jhn 6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

Jhn 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jhn 6:45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.

It is Divine power of God overcoming the innate enmity of man to God which make him WILLING to come, because by nature all men are unwilling to come.

"Thy people shall be willing in the day of YOUR POWER( ps 110)

4,775 posted on 09/14/2010 5:04:21 PM PDT by RnMomof7 (Jhn 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? [even] because ye cannot hear my word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4688 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

No, I have a problem with your view of Jesus loving little children, calling them to Him, while creating some of them solely for hellfire tinder.


4,776 posted on 09/14/2010 5:05:42 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4774 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Well read the bible, only a remnant is ever saved.


4,777 posted on 09/14/2010 5:06:42 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4776 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

None of which proves totally depraved, double predestination or irresistible grace.


4,778 posted on 09/14/2010 5:07:04 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4775 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

I read the Bible. All of it.

Calvin was a lawyer who uses verses to build a great case - for a guilty god.


4,779 posted on 09/14/2010 5:08:34 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4777 | View Replies]

To: metmom
I simply cannot accept the concept that God commands all people everywhere to repent and then creates them incapable of doing so.

God created Adam and Eve with free will. The Fall changed things. Radically.

Unless a man has been reborn by the Holy Spirit, that man will always and only choose poorly.

I'll defend to the bitter end salvation through Christ alone apart from works, the security of the believer, that man cannot come to God unless drawn by the work of the Holy Spirit in his life, and that God is sovereign, but just cannot defend the kind of predestination which makes us mere puppets and God capricious.

What you have first described is what Calvinists believe.

If man did not have free will, God would not be constantly challenging us to choose.

God tells us to do a lot of things He knows we can't do unless and until the Holy Spirit regenerates our wills and mind to know the things of God, to repent and believe.

Have you ever read "Bondage of the Will" by Luther?

4,780 posted on 09/14/2010 5:12:56 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4760 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,741-4,7604,761-4,7804,781-4,800 ... 15,821-15,828 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson