Intended Catholic Dictatorship

Independent Individualist ^ | 8/27/10 | Reginald Firehammer

[Quix]

Maybe that’s why they never seem to be able to learn something or move past their errors. They don’t have any answers.

---

WELL PUT. THEY SEEM TO EQUATE !!!!TRADITIONS!!!!

WITH ‘BIBLICAL’ AND WITH ‘ANSWERS.’

[Quix]

What an
ABSURD
HILLARIOUS
(YET PATHETIC)
JURY-RIGGED
STRETCHY REALITY
RIDICULOUS
!FARCE!
OF AN
ASSERTION!

[Al Hitan]

WELL PUT. THEY SEEM TO EQUATE !!!!TRADITIONS!!!! WITH ‘BIBLICAL’ AND WITH ‘ANSWERS.’

Y'all (i.e. plural you) say that like there are denominations without traditions.

[Quix]

It is more rigorously enforced on the Religion Forum by our stalwart and tireless herder of cats, the RM.

Occasionally, he may overlook minor infractions given the press of herding all the rabid cats.

However, usually he’s pretty thorough and not much gets by him.

[Al Hitan]

[Quix]

Uhhhhhh . . . a bit of a . . . more than a bit of a . . .

lop-sided description, imho.

[Quix]

What an
ABSURD
HILLARIOUS
(YET PATHETIC)
JURY-RIGGED
STRETCHY REALITY
RIDICULOUS
!FARCE!
OF AN
ASSERTION!

[Al Hitan]

Look at me! Look at me! It's all about me!

[Quix]

I don’t see any qualifications in the Scripture.

However, flesh driven interpretations and judgments are hazardsous.

[Quix]

Awwwwwwwwwwwwww

whine, wail, whine wail.

Soooooooooooo, I wonder just WHO

is the most personally assaulted in a legally thinly veiled impersonal way .....

Actually, I don’t wonder at all. I see him regularly in my mirror.

The rabid cliques still hold the Olympic Gold Medals

for hypocrisies, double speak, self-contradictions, farce proffered as truth and unmitigated fantasized hogwash by a wide margin.

[Quix]

By God’s Grace, rarely in recent years.

[Quix]

Of course, that’s not for lack of RC’s earnest efforts, diligence, lobbying, coercing even

!!!!DEMANDING!!!!

that FR conform to their fantasies of FR as directly controlled arm of the Vatican.

[Al Hitan]

By God’s Grace, rarely in recent years.

So, you have had a post, or more, deleted?

[Quix]

Yeah . . . far too often it seems that far more RC’s outrageous over the line posts get overlooked.

I just consider it residue of the first FR years’ !!!!TRADITIONAL!!!! favoritism toward the RC’s.

[Quix]

Not really.

The RM prefers, IIRC, that ‘you’ etc. be avoided in negative terms all the time.

[Quix]

It’s not about reason. It’s a brake or a fly-wheel placed on discourse to keep it from getting too crazy.

= ====

WHY do so few RC’s seem to realize that and to chafe against the rules so relentlessly?

Oh, right, the notoriously thin kinds of the rabid cliques and their members.

[Al Hitan]

The RM prefers, IIRC, that ‘you’ etc. be avoided in negative terms all the time

Y'all would know.

[Running On Empty]

All that was necessary was a “yes” or “no”.

[Jvette]

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quick, call out the dog! Ping all the sycophants.

Sorry, can’t stop laughing, can’t post more, tears streaming down my face, tears of laughter at the audacity of y’all.

[Al Hitan]

Ping all the sycophants

I wondered about that. Is that the UFO fan club that is pinged in every post that has a negative mention of Catholics?