The Manhattan Declaration: Why didn’t you sign it, R.C.? (R.C. Sproul Did not sign the Declaration)

Ligonier Ministries ^ | 12/11/2009 | R.C. Sproul

[circlecity]

On a semi related note, Sproul just published a 500+ page commentary on the book of Romans which I look forward to reading over the Christmas holidays. Given Sproul’s strong background in philosphy it out to be very interesting.

[elpadre]

“Sproul is deeply concerned that Chuck Colson believes this document is a “form of catechism for the foundational truths of the faith.”

I disagree. I see it as a place to stand. The signers state they are willing to stand their ground for the Lord in the face of the enemy.

When the going gets tough, the tough will get going.

[elpadre]

“Sproul is deeply concerned that Chuck Colson believes this document is a “form of catechism for the foundational truths of the faith.”

I disagree. I see it as a place to stand. The signers state they are willing to stand their ground for the Lord in the face of the enemy.

When the going gets tough, the tough will get going.

[HarleyD]

RC is correct. The reason why the church has the problems it does is because it has moved from the gospel to ecumenticalism.

[Sporaticus]

With this purely political alliance/issue, RC Sproul is truly weird! All who profess belief in Christ must come together on these matters of life, religious liberty, marriage -PERIOD-, flawed document/theology,etc aside.