Posted on 10/17/2009 4:39:18 PM PDT by Jedediah
“. . . .BELIEVER IN ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING. . . “
IS A BRAZEN FALSEHOOD . . .
at best outrageous hyperbole.
. . . so outrageous as to be brazenly bearing false witness.
Many millions have seen optical light refraction, atmospheric electricity or plasma effect. It happens somewhere every day - with scientific data. Google is your friend.
Now, about those UFOs you’ve seen: Aliens aboard? Not possibly naturally occurring atmospheric events that you show ignorance of, not possibly earthling activity?
How do you know? Please share.
Have shared tons of times.
Have posted about the documented more than 3,000 cases of trace landing evidences etc. etc. etc. etc.
Naysayers persistently deny reality.
I have limited, very limited motivation for complying with a shred of their demands.
Then let’s keep it simple. Tell about one of your UFO sightings and how you eliminated natural and man-made causes.
“Naysayers persistently deny reality’
______________
Reality? LOLOL
Your “reality” is Fallen Angels PRETENDING to be ALIENS.
So are they not really ALIENS at all?
Are they Aliens or Fallen Angels?
If they’re Fallen Angels PRETENDING to be Aliens, then they’re NOT Aliens, right?
Or is there BOTH -
1. Real Aliens
2. Fallen Angels Pretending to be Aliens
There’s no debate, go to JEFF’s homepage, he constantly links to his BLOG.
Why do you deny REALITY.
You don’t speak for the Lord God Almighty, no matter how self-righteous you get.
WHAT SILLINESS.
EVERYONE’S HOME PAGES . . . with any links at all . . . the links are up 24/7.
Why do you rail at Jedediah alone?
What is the root of this blood lust?
Why the Vendetta?
Sheesh.
You make it sound like he includes the link in a signature line at the bottom of every post
WHICH HE HAS NEVER DONE.
You are WRONG.
has a listing of some of the better scientifically documented and analyzed cases on such scores.
Help yourself.
I don’t know how many times you’ve been told and shown this, he creates threads that link to his blog, and you’re the only one who denies it. It’s not even debatable. You screaming that I’m wrong all the time is just childish.
Let’s talk about something important.
The Fallen Angels, who pretend to be Aliens, are they not technically Aliens?
Are there also regular Aliens from elsewhere who are not Angels and just pure Aliens?
Do the Fallen Angels and the Real Aliens have the same agenda? Are they working together?
I’m asking for your cases.
Describe one of your UFO sightings and how you eliminated natural and man-made causes.
Bentwaters works.
So do each of the 3,000 trace landing cases. I think that ref is at earthfiles.com
Not going to do much today.
Not likely to do naysayers research for them ever.
Again: I’m asking for your research on your cases.
I’m a puzzle piece collector
My relative worked around them.
That’s sufficient for me.
Describe "them" and "worked around".
That’s sufficient for me.
Why?
Have answered those questions lots hereon.
Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m assuming you have your own personal experience with UFOs/aliens.
In general, how do you eliminate natural and man-made causes and events.
Usual saucer shapes and sizes.
coming and going from adjacent test area where he worked and was one of 2 authorized binoculars.
He’s a believable guy, to me.
Worked with a well known German physicist but I forget his name. Not super famous. Just well known.
No. Not of any great drama.
Joya and I were coming back from Durango . . . late afternoon.
At Aztec, it was getting on toward twilight. Way off to the South extarpolated to roughly between NAPI . . . well, the center of NAPI . . .
very high up . . . looked like a balloon with a gondola but was not behaving like a balloon. Bright in the sun at that altitude.
Pulled over into Wendy’s parking lot, took out binoculars.
It was a standard, relatively small sized looking triangle UFO with the 3 biggish lights in the usual places. Watched it for 20 min or so thru binoculars. It slowly seemed to go higher and further South. My cousin and wife saw it, as well.
Was NOT a balloon.
Have studied the topic since Jr High . . . 1962.
Mostly collect puzzle pieces. Been able to interview international experts across 2-3 continents . . . including the best Japanese UFO expert.
Don’t have a great deal of patience left for naysayers any more. The data is quite conclusive. Only the willfully blind and those terminally uninformed, &/or the willfully addicted to a virtual certainty of a TYPE II error are on the other side.
I don’t really give a very big rip what naysayers think or say of me . . . though their duplicity is often outrageous and sometimes annoying.
Most of the natural/man made causes etc. tend to filter out early . . . particularly with very experienced military and other witnesses.
Doesn’t matter to me if the good cases are 5% or 25% or 35% or whatever . . .
A solid percentage has been there all along.
As has tons of disinformation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.