Posted on 09/04/2009 12:39:30 PM PDT by greyfoxx39
A government that was looking for ways to minimize the LDS Church's influence in its country could choose to classify those 78 hour weeks as "work" (and I'm sure it feels like work to the missionaries). I believe it was only a very few years ago that the LDS Church changed the missionaries' expenses are paid -- instead of the missionaries or their families paying their own expenses directly, the Church charges a fixed amount and everybody pays the same, so it doesn't cost more to get sent on a mission to Tokyo) probably still the most expensive city in the world) than to get sent on a mission to a third world country. As a result, missionaries are receiving expense money and housing directly from the Church, via the Church's offices in the country where the mission is being served. Given the standard of living in some of the countries where missionary work is going on (including Guyana) this amounts to compensation that's well above the average for the country's citizens. The government could say that those "jobs" should go to its own citizens.
Now, if this practice were REVERSED you would see the "persecution of mormons" cry raised up to the rooftops.
Yup. And not just the rising up of the persecution complex -- but the bombastic cries of "religious bigotry" as well -- selecting a hairdresser on the basis of the religion of the hairdresser.
Now mind you, I support the Mormons' right to frequent the economic choices they preference. The point here, as you put so well, GF, is that were the reverse to happen, the Mormons and their allies come out of the woodworks to haul out these charges of "religious bigotry."
How 'bout come consistency around here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.