Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Salvation Outside the Church
Catholic Answers ^ | 12/05 | Fr. Ray Ryland

Posted on 06/27/2009 10:33:55 PM PDT by bdeaner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 2,801-2,817 next last
To: bdeaner

“I suggest it’s not your heart, it’s the Father of Lies telling you that. Without spiritual discernment, it’s not always easy to tell the difference.”

Thanks for the response but you are wrong.

Instead of attacking me why don’t you address my points? Why don’t you explain why Jesus went out among the sinners, seeking a direct connection. But that the Catholic church requires an intermediary on the assumption we cannot speak to God ourselves.


1,021 posted on 06/30/2009 4:52:40 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1011 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“So you reject the Trinity too. “

No, ya see I’ve read the book. I’ve felt the Holy Spirit.


1,022 posted on 06/30/2009 4:53:26 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 948 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; stfassisi

Read Augustine? I mean REALLY read Augustine?

Much of what Calvin and others took as predestination is Augustine talking about God being all knowing and existing outside of time. In “Confessions”, near the end, there is a part that I swear a writer of the Star Trek franchise put into an episode or two.


1,023 posted on 06/30/2009 4:54:13 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1016 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“Where? Saying “brain surgery” is simple, too. Doing it is another matter.”

Being saved isn’t brain surgery. The steps are simple if you are willing to take them. Thats where most people fail, their pride and willful nature keep them from taking those steps.


1,024 posted on 06/30/2009 4:54:49 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
No, ya see I’ve read the book. I’ve felt the Holy Spirit.

That's just one more way I know the Truth of Christ's Church.

1,025 posted on 06/30/2009 4:56:54 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1022 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“Which may be why the protestant concepts of sin are as simplistic and sophomoric as a child who thinks arithmetic principles are the limit of “math.” “

Thats a winning argument, call protestants simple and stupid and you are sure to convert them to the catholic way!!!


1,026 posted on 06/30/2009 4:57:01 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“I’m familiar with the “once saved” doctrine. It’s unscriptural. “

Source please, because I can show you where Jesus said it is true.


1,027 posted on 06/30/2009 4:57:51 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies]

To: bdeaner

“Just about the ONLY thing that unites them, other than belief in Jesus Christ, is their rejection of the Catholic Church”

You take yourself way toooo seriously. Nobody sits around thinking of ways to reject the catholic church.

What unites us is our love for Jesus and desire to share that love with others.


1,028 posted on 06/30/2009 5:01:58 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

“lol. How does a man “act genuinely?” “

he can’t, we cannot be good enough or do enough good works to be saved and spend eternity in Heaven.


1,029 posted on 06/30/2009 5:04:37 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 950 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. “

Jesus says it does.


1,030 posted on 06/30/2009 5:05:44 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 953 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
What you have done lately is to take every questionable practice of Rome and defend it, not by Scripture, but by a goofy mindless recitation of "God is outside of time."

I'm concerned about your mental state ,Dr E.

Almost all of the Aquinas posted to you by me over the past few weeks is backed up with scripture

If you deny God being outside of time than God is not omnipotent, and therefore not God.

1,031 posted on 06/30/2009 5:07:24 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1016 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Petronski

Wait a minute, I thought it wasn’t Rome.


1,032 posted on 06/30/2009 5:11:59 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 993 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

“That’s just one more way I know the Truth of Christ’s Church. “

Please don’t project meaning into my statement that is clearly not there.

I don’t support idol worship, I don’t support making men into gods, I don’t support good works for salvation, I don’t support paying for forgiveness freely given and I don’t support requiring an intermediary for talking with God.


1,033 posted on 06/30/2009 5:18:05 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi; Dr. Eckleburg

“If you deny God being outside of time than God is not omnipotent, and therefore not God. “

Genesis

5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

8 God called the expanse “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.

12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.” 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.

31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.


1,034 posted on 06/30/2009 5:22:15 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
If your trying to make a point that God thinks in succession and does not already know everything in one NOW ,than you're saying God has to think beforehand and does not know Himself?Thus God would change.This disagrees with Scripture

“Every best gift, and every perfect gift, is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no change, nor shadow of alteration”.James 1:17

God reveals some things to us in HUMAN understanding ie Genesis

1,035 posted on 06/30/2009 5:38:35 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi

“If your trying to make a point that God thinks in succession and does not already know everything in one NOW “

I’m pointing out that God does things in succession. That’s the first example. Throughout the Bible there are references to time and Gods use of it.

The verse you quote has nothing to do with time.


1,036 posted on 06/30/2009 5:44:31 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Oh, knock it off. You don’t have a clue.


1,037 posted on 06/30/2009 5:59:23 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
“”I’m pointing out that God does things in succession. That’s the first example. Throughout the Bible there are references to time and Gods use of it.””

That's only how you understand it in your finite mind-which is not reality with God who does not predict -He already KNOWS ALL THINGS

Perhaps this might help..

That nothing is predicated of God and other beings synonymously* By Saint Thomas Aquinas

AN effect that does not receive a form specifically like the form whereby the agent acts, is incapable of receiving in synonymous predication the name taken from that form.* But, of the things whereof God is cause, the forms do not attain to the species of the divine efficacy, since they receive piecemeal and in particular what is found in God simply and universally.

3. Everything that is predicated of several things synonymously, is either genus species, differentia, accidens, or proprium. But nothing is predicated of God as genus, as has been shown (Chap. XXV); and in like manner neither as differentia; nor again as species, which is made up of genus and differentia; nor can any accident attach to Him, as has been shown (Chap. XXIII); and thus nothing is predicated of God either as accident or as proprium, for proprium is of the class of accidents. The result is that nothing is predicated synonymously of God and other beings.

6. Whatever is predicated of things so as to imply that one thing precedes and the other is consequent and dependent on the former, is certainly not predicated synonymously. Now nothing is predicated of God and of other beings as though they stood in the same rank, but it is implied that one precedes, and the other is consequent and dependent. Of God all predicates are predicated essentially. He is called ‘being’ to denote that He is essence itself; and ‘good,’ to denote that He is goodness itself. But of other beings predications are made to denote participation. Thus Socrates is called ‘a man,’ not that he is humanity itself, but one having humanity. It is impossible therefore for any predicate to be applied synonymously and in the same sense to God and other beings.

1,038 posted on 06/30/2009 6:02:50 PM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1036 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I think it’s incredibly sad that Catholics have no assurance of their salvation. Even scripture says we can have that assurance but when we tell them things like that, they boo hoo and call it OUR interpretation. I’ll take any one of ours over theirs any day of the week


1,039 posted on 06/30/2009 6:11:42 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Then the Catholic Church is leading you astray if you believe that you will go to hell for not fulfilling your religious obligations. That, my friend, is heresy. You will only go to hell if you reject the Lord Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. Period.


1,040 posted on 06/30/2009 6:14:42 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 2,801-2,817 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson