Skip to comments.
Minnesota Professor Pledges to Desecrate Eucharist
Catholic League ^
| 7/10/2008
| n/a
Posted on 07/10/2008 7:28:58 AM PDT by Pyro7480
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 221-229 next last
To: Centurion2000
Have your faith (I have mine and my morality standards), but don't get all bent out of shape if you can't or won't be able to debate it against science or the five sensesYou claim to "believe in God," but you're actually a naturalist, a Deist at best.
121
posted on
07/10/2008 9:28:28 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
("If the angels could be jealous of men, they would be so for one reason: Holy Communion." -M. Kolbe)
To: Centurion2000
...cracker worshippers...The hate drips from your words.
122
posted on
07/10/2008 9:28:41 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Petronski
...cracker worshippers... The hate drips from your words.
Not at all. I was just quoting another poster in my reply. Read it a little closer.
I don't hate Catholics, my father was an altar boy. I just don't believe in transubstatiation at all.
123
posted on
07/10/2008 9:31:22 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
To: Petronski; Centurion2000
Actually, Centurion was merely quoting the term I first used, though he said basically the same thing, in so many words.
124
posted on
07/10/2008 9:31:37 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
("If the angels could be jealous of men, they would be so for one reason: Holy Communion." -M. Kolbe)
To: Pyro7480
...though he said basically the same thing, in so many words.Which is my point.
125
posted on
07/10/2008 9:33:33 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
To: Centurion2000
“There also wouldn’t be a conservative movement if there weren’t people to defend the Constitution, even when it sometimes flies in the face of what “cracker worshippers” want to do to impose their morality / standards on others.”
Since you’ve made this statement, what do us “cracker worshippers” want to impose on you?
I don’t ask you to believe our faith. I’m just asking that the Eucharist not be desecrated.
To: Zionist Conspirator
I don’t think you would be happy if he threatened to desecrate a Jewish temple. Show some class.
127
posted on
07/10/2008 9:34:21 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
(Deport illegals the same way they came here - one at a time.)
Comment #128 Removed by Moderator
Comment #129 Removed by Moderator
To: DManA; Centurion2000; All
Do NOT use potty language on the Religion Forum.
To: DManA
Stealing a communion host is no different from walking into a church and peeing on the alter. It's a lot different. One is misappropriation of what most people are going to call a piece of bread. The other is destruction / vandalization of private property.
If you give someone the host, it becomes their personal property; THEY get to decide what to do with it.
131
posted on
07/10/2008 9:42:45 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
To: Centurion2000
“Which basically means that you are trying to restrict someone else’s freedoms.”
Really. The freedom to come into a Catholic church, take the Eucharist surreptitiously, and then hold it and Catholics up to public scorn, sacrilege and ridicule.
To: Centurion2000
Real conservatives will sometimes have to defend positions that they may personally find abhorrent. No, real conservatives will not defend someone threatening to desecrate the Eucharist as free speech. Maybe an ACLU member would, but not a conservative. I might disagree with the Baptist faith (for example), but I would never defend someone invading their house of worship and desecrating it, especially as an act of "free speech".
133
posted on
07/10/2008 9:47:26 AM PDT
by
Hacksaw
(Deport illegals the same way they came here - one at a time.)
To: NorthWoody; Manic_Episode; mikethevike; coder2; AmericanChef; Reaganesque; ER Doc; lesser_satan; ...
WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!
98 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!!
FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!
To: Centurion2000
Remind me not to let you put your hands on The Torah.
To: OpusatFR
Really. The freedom to come into a Catholic church, take the Eucharist surreptitiously, and then hold it and Catholics up to public scorn, sacrilege and ridicule. Yep. It's unpleasant / morally wrong but it's their freedom. The road you propose leads to theocracy. I'll pass on being temporally ruled by any religious figure.
If Catholics want to make this large of a deal about this then why not take measures to stop someone from doing it? Like having the priest place the host in the petitioner's mouth?
136
posted on
07/10/2008 9:49:34 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
To: Centurion2000
“The road you propose leads to theocracy. I’ll pass on being temporally ruled by any religious figure.”
That’s really stretching it. Common courtesy and civility has nothing to do with establishing a theocracy.
You speak from Robespierre and Danton, not from The Constitution of the United States of America.
To: Pyro7480; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
138
posted on
07/10/2008 9:53:35 AM PDT
by
NYer
("Ignorance of scripture is ignorance of Christ." - St. Jerome)
To: Hacksaw
No, real conservatives will not defend someone threatening to desecrate the Eucharist as free speech. Maybe an ACLU member would, but not a conservative. I might disagree with the Baptist faith (for example), but I would never defend someone invading their house of worship and desecrating it, especially as an act of "free speech". Morally what the guy is doing is wrong. That doesn't make it illegal. And there are a social conservatives and fiscal conservatives.
Remember this line? "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it to the death."
139
posted on
07/10/2008 9:54:18 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
To: GCC Catholic
Communion in the hand began as a calculated act of disobedience which was passively tolerated by a weak curia.
It has to end.
140
posted on
07/10/2008 9:54:41 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 221-229 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson