Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DR. PUSEY ON THE WORSHIP OF MARY IN THE CHURCH OF ROME
Sword and the Trowel ^ | 1866 | Charles Spurgeon

Posted on 05/14/2008 10:16:49 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,001-1,013 next last
To: OpusatFR

This thread is so Henry the 8th.

“Papists”, really?

When most folks hear that word, the polite discussion usually stops. Why drag this piece from the 1800’s up? What was the point?

you know you are dealing with someone insecure in there own religion that you feel the need to attack someone else’s beliefs. That is not what this country was founded on.


61 posted on 05/15/2008 5:47:03 AM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ktime

Bravissimo!


62 posted on 05/15/2008 5:48:30 AM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

I don’t have to believe zilch.

My name is the Cynic within my family and my circle.

Your Protestant teachers have taught Rapture and other unbiblical ideas. There are Protestants with Blessed Prayer Cloths and other things. That’s an agreement in your circle?

There seems to be a HUGE debate on the different aspects of pre-, post, a, or whatever millinarianism along with lots of discussion on other issues.

The pious beliefs of some, and the theological meanderings of those more learned than you or I are not dispised, but until it is Dogma, it isn’t declared.

The Holy Spirit will work in the Church as He has always worked in the Church..in His own Good Time.

You all need to stop declaring it a Dogma of the Church. It isn’t. It may be tomorrow or in a thousand years, but right now it isn’t.


63 posted on 05/15/2008 5:52:00 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Internet Torquemada of FR. Trip over yourself at your own risk. I don't answer some posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ktime

Thank you for those words of sanity.

I’m going to plant my tomatoes now and leave them to continue flogging their dead horse.


64 posted on 05/15/2008 5:54:07 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Internet Torquemada of FR. Trip over yourself at your own risk. I don't answer some posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

“Your pope believes Mary is the co=Redeemer”

This is not true.

Please offer proof of what you have said.


65 posted on 05/15/2008 5:54:16 AM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Not a single source, yet you cling to it so fervently. Yes, Catholic Marian doctrines have existed since the first century, Dr. Eck, and they have been distorted and exaggerated since the 16th.


67 posted on 05/15/2008 5:57:30 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Yes, Catholic Marian doctrines have existed since the first century, Dr. Eck, and they have been distorted and exaggerated since the 16th.

And yet those distortions and exaggerations live on in the words, pronouncements and writings of bishops, cardinals, popes, saints and the "faithful" who trust them -- without official rebuke of any kind from the Vatican. Go figure --

68 posted on 05/15/2008 6:09:59 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Yeah, go figure such an eminent scholar as Charles Spurgeon doesn’t provide any sources.


69 posted on 05/15/2008 6:26:20 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

“It’s getting a little crowded in there, isn’t it??? “

lol


70 posted on 05/15/2008 6:29:32 AM PDT by Augustinian monk (You going to pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?- Jose Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Just curious — Have you ever heard or read anything from a Catholic prelate or other official source stating that Mary is also in the Eucharist????


71 posted on 05/15/2008 6:31:40 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: A.A. Cunningham; Dr. Eckleburg
Perhaps you have no desire to be honest. Perhaps you see nothing wrong with bearing false witness against the Catholic Church.
Perhaps.
73 posted on 05/15/2008 6:33:00 AM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
Roman Catholics in the Philippines certainly don’t deny that they actually worship the blessed so-called virgin, who didn’t die a virgin — she had other children after Christ was born. It was only necessary that Jesus Christ be virgin born, not his half-brothers or half-sisters.

I don't know of any Catholics (in the Philippines or elsewhere) who believe that Mary had any other children, or that she ever lost her virginity. And AFAIK, Catholics believe that Mary herself was "immaculately conceived" (ie in similar manner to Jesus).

74 posted on 05/15/2008 6:33:16 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

I am stuck on the question of WHY do people RCC or anyone else - expend SO MUCH effort on extra-Biblical doctrines? Why create so many “talking points” and defend such extra-Biblical stuff so stridently?

The ONLY conclusion I can come to is that of being unsatisfied with Christ. If Christ is enough, no need for all this distracting, argumentative, religion - be it Marianism or PurposeDrivenism.

A pox on the whole lot of religious zealots for whom Christ is not adequate!


75 posted on 05/15/2008 6:33:26 AM PDT by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

Jumping to conclusions and generalizing is just conjecture.


76 posted on 05/15/2008 6:37:55 AM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Poor, poor Joseph. Never got to enjoy the God-given prerogative of marriage. /s I don’t believe that. Nor is their any Scriptural necessity of it after the birth of Jesus Christ. I don’t believe Joseph had children by a previous marriage. That’s just concocted. Jesus had half-brothers after his birth. There is no Scriptural reason to believe otherwise.


77 posted on 05/15/2008 6:38:43 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

100,000 is the highest estimate. 10,000 is the low. The real number is probably in between.

As a catholic I cannot ignore the fact that this happened, and I will not try to defend it. It was a senseless slaughter, period.


78 posted on 05/15/2008 6:40:32 AM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog; DannyTN

Thank you Danny!!!
I loved your post. It shows that although we have different ideas, we can talk on a thread and not constantly slam eachother.

I have said many a time, I love the kind and Loving Non-Catholics on FR. And I would count that as MOST.

Lord Love you Danny! You are truly blessed in the ways of Christ.


79 posted on 05/15/2008 6:40:52 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am Ironmom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Catholics believe that Mary herself was "immaculately conceived" (ie in similar manner to Jesus).

Come on now Alex. You've been in enough debates around here to know that there is NO SIMILARITY between the Immaculate Conception and the Incarnation. Catholics DO NOT believe that Mary was conceived in a non-sexual way and you know it.

80 posted on 05/15/2008 6:42:00 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,001-1,013 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson