DR. PUSEY ON THE WORSHIP OF MARY IN THE CHURCH OF ROME

Sword and the Trowel ^ | 1866 | Charles Spurgeon

[windsorknot]

I lurk, rarely post, because I am appalled at the nastiness of it all.

I don't know what it is like to visit the DU, but it must be a lot like reading through these threads.

[xzins]

I didn’t write article.

I’m looking for your prioritizing of those you find most offensive.

You’re either going to answer my request or not. If not, just let me know, and I’ll drop it.

[mockingbyrd]

did you ever get an answer to this very logical question?

[netmilsmom]

>>I was speaking of all those years where such was allowed to cultivated to encouraged on the part of the magicsterical.<<

Huh?
Well if the “magicsterical” was allowed to cultivate “such”, who are you talking about that got cultivated?

[big'ol_freeper]

Nanu, nanu.

[narses]

LOL, you defend the article. Start with the first lie filled sentence. We can go on from there. I also pinged you to a thread that documents the early Protestant leadership and their views on the Holy Virgin Mary. That thread has the proto-protestant refutation of the lies posted here. Feel free to express your opions there as well.

[IrishCatholic]

No, you don’t get to excuse this. I have never posted a thread that denigrated another’s belief. I would never attack someone else’s understanding of Christ.
Catholic posts are either posts of positive conversions to the Catholic faith or positive posts about the Catholic faith. I don’t see constant attack threads from the same people over and over again—coming from Catholic posters. True Christians who are not Catholic post positive Christ centered stories that inspire others with Christ.

Evil is evil. You have to call it when you see it: bigotry, ignorance, hatred. How you can call that love is beyond me. It is twisted and sick and in no way Christian.

[netmilsmom]

>>Similarly, John Paul the Great’s words are not doctrine, nor did his speaking of them make them doctrine. They are not a teaching of the Catholic Church. If they were, they would be in the Catechism. <<

I just want to know what words are in the (...) parts of the JPII quotes.

And of course I’ll I can find is references to it from Hate sites.

Hmmmmmmm.

When Libs do that to a GWB speech, the FReepers are all over it, but the Pope? Absolute fact.

[xzins]

When did you ping me to another thread?

[narses]

LOL, ouch.

[Fichori]

Thats enough to make your head spin!

Yikes!

[narses]

Just now.

[annie laurie]

I think you’re onto something, there ;-)

[big'ol_freeper]

You said: Evil is evil. You have to call it when you see it: bigotry, ignorance, hatred. How you can call that love is beyond me. It is twisted and sick and in no way Christian.

Um...you got that right.

Flamed and skewered, but likely not repentant.

[big'ol_freeper]

And...another winner:

[netmilsmom]

Good to see you here!

[Petronski]

No it wouldn’t, because I didn’t edit it to say “100,000.”

I made no claim you edited anything. I did point out that anyone is free to put anything they want on there.

[1000 silverlings]

Well according to some astronomer who just happens to be the Vatican's director of astronomy, but doesn't speak for the vatican or the pope, but who is authorized to make press releases, aliens are Catholics brothers. So what if they are animal, mineral or vegetable or (Ephesians 2:2) the prince of the air, and emember, you can believe in them, but you can't believe they can fly.

[Titanites]

Do not assume the "co" in "co-redeemer" means "equal to." It does not. The "co" is the Latin word "cum," meaning "with." I have personally explained this to you before.

It is difficult for me to understand Christians who do not think they are co-workers with God.