Posted on 05/04/2008 11:14:46 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper
I’ll stick with sola scripture any time over the church ‘fathers’ and their interpretations.
Parading ignorance is sooooo informative.
It is a Tradition of Men.
Regarding the iron mottled with clay, Daniel Chapter 2 records how Daniel interprets King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream for him. Scripture points out the gold head is Nebuchadnexxar himself. Chapter 7 parallels the interpretation.
That is true, it never uses the words “Unidentified Flying Object” (a modern term) but it often mentions flying things (odd, in an error of no airplanes) and also has some references that are stunning on their own- for example it has the phrase “there were giants on the world in those days”
I am curious what people here think of that
It’s kind of sad that you miss out on so much fun.
However . . . am not one to look a gift horse in the mouth tooooo much.
I do hope you are taking 3 or so teaspoons of apple cider vinegar in a glass of water daily. Many health benefits including lower blood pressure.
LOL.
My blood pressure is fine.
Thanks. Will be a while before I review it with so many irons in the fire before heading out to AZ to see Dad and the FREEPERS there.
Blessings,
So you've never seen a UFO...Why bother to comment then???
Nonsense. The Bible was written by men under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Cheez.
True. Catholic men.
And sola scriptura does not appear therein. It is a tradition of men.
No, dear one, they were not Catholics. What a heresy you believe here.
Er.....I've seen numerous. "Unidentified Flying Objects", right? Key word, "unidentified".
The whole point of my post was to point out that the colloquial use of the term "UFO", is a nonsense. If you want to tell the world that you think you've seen an alien spacecraft then come right out and say it. Don't hide behind the term "UFO" because a UFO is just that; an unidentified object.
Identifying it as a likely vehicle of extraterrestrial origin nullifies the use of the term "unidentified". My inability to definitively identify an object observed in the heavens does not logically imply alien life forms.
That's kook country.
I'm not too keen on the mutilation aspect but can you tell me a little more about the ones which abduct you and force you to have sex?
Specifically, are they distinct entities from the "mutilating" UFOs, how does one tell the difference and what time is the next one due and where is its departure point?
Oh yes........and do they have little green women on board? If I'm going to have fornication forced on me, I'd rather it not be with men.
Instead you would lead us into Catholic error.
They are all around us.
Be careful who you hook up with.
I think you are just misinformed about the doctrine of sola Scriptura. It might be that the UFO groupies around these parts are clueless as well.
See Solo Scriptura: The Difference a Vowel Makes by Keith Mathison
I’ll
PRETEND
your query was serious . . .
No, the critters are essentially the same group of critters as far as anyone can tell.
And some of the critters one is compelled to have sex with are quite . . . unlovely except that the critters have the capacity to overwhelm our brains with pseudo images suitable for . . . harvesting . . . the goodies, so to speak.
Sometimes, it appears that a mechanistic laboratory probe or alternative for males is involved . . . sometimes quite painfully.
Then, of course, there are the vats sighted on vast ships . . . of some sort of slurry . . . sometimes seen with human body parts floating in it.’
That doesn’t even get into the whole reptilian thing at all.
What a sweet pile of stinking balderdash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.