Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the Real Martin Luther Please Stand Up
FAIRLDS ^ | by John A. Tvedtnes

Posted on 05/04/2008 8:52:49 AM PDT by restornu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Grunthor

Not to mention Luther didn’t claim to be a Prophet. Just a seeker of Truth like the rest of us.


21 posted on 05/04/2008 9:37:05 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

The Catholic church is TOTALLY unified on all topics religious.


22 posted on 05/04/2008 9:38:20 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
It would be wrong to conclude that Martin Luther was a "Mormon" or that he saw everything the same way Joseph Smith did...
In January 1533, Henry secretly married Anne and thus became a polygamist.

Well it looks like Henry VIII had a lot in common with Joseph Smith. Secret marriages.

This article is a crack up. Trying to paint Luther as a wanna-be Mormon and equating Henry VIII's secret marriage to Ann Boylin as equal to the Mormon doctrine of polygamy and Joseph Smith's secret marriage to 14 year old Helen Kimball is hilarious.

LET THE LIGHT SHINE!

23 posted on 05/04/2008 9:38:42 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: restornu
"John Calvin, for example, emphasized the concept of predestination, an idea also advanced by Luther."

Calvin never "emphasized" the concept of predestination. It didn't even appear in the first three editions of Institutes. Once it did appear the topic takes up about 50 pages out of 1500. Calvin was almost apologetic about predestination when he did include it, pointing out that he didn't like the implications of it but it was unavoidable as the logical conclusion of the true nature of Grace.

24 posted on 05/04/2008 9:38:42 AM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu
I don't know about you but I know I won't be. Else why did Jesus die on the cross?

we all will be held accountable for our words!

25 posted on 05/04/2008 9:40:48 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DManA
The Catholic church is TOTALLY unified on all topics religious.

The Catechism certainly is. Folks who veer from that aren't properly Catholic.

26 posted on 05/04/2008 9:44:04 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Calvin never "emphasized" the concept of predestination.

Calvinism certainly does....it's positively obsessed with the topic.

...it was unavoidable as the logical conclusion of the true nature of Grace....as Cauvin saw it.

27 posted on 05/04/2008 9:46:16 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

In that case the “real” number of Catholics is about 1/4 of the official one.


28 posted on 05/04/2008 9:46:34 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: restornu; greyfoxx39; Grunthor; colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; ...
Please be my guess say all you want about Prophet Joseph Smtih

I don't believe that I need your permission for that. Nor do you need my permission to say anything you want about Luther.

we all will be held accountable for our words!

That's why I use spellcheck.

29 posted on 05/04/2008 9:47:29 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"Calvinism certainly does....it's positively obsessed with the topic."

No, critics of Calvinism are the ones obsessed with it. Calvinists see as a very small componant of the most consistent and integrated systematization of theology ever penned.

30 posted on 05/04/2008 9:49:46 AM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: restornu; greyfoxx39; Elsie
Eck responded with the words of Augustine,(a man and a sinner -like the rest of us - why didn't he quote holy scripture?) "I should not believe the Gospel did not the authority of the Church lead me thereto." Luther replied that it was the Bible that had brought the Church into existence, being a revelation of Christ. Historically, this is incorrect; Christ founded the Church, but none of the books of the New Testament were written during the Savior's sojourn in mortality.

Ha!

The WORST debate counter point ever produced!

31 posted on 05/04/2008 9:50:29 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I wasn't in church during the time when the statements were made.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The WORST debate counter point ever produced!

Yeah with non LDS foot notes!:)


32 posted on 05/04/2008 10:08:21 AM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

“That’s why I use spellcheck.”

hehehehehe


33 posted on 05/04/2008 10:20:50 AM PDT by Grunthor (You can't perform a circumcision with a chainsaw!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Luther removed James, Hebrews, Jude, and Revelation from their normal places and relegated them to the end of the New Testament, as not being entitled to the same status as other biblical books. In his New Testament table of contents, he numbered books 1-23 and then placed the four rejected ones without numbers.

He had his own vision, and was not about to let a lousy technicality like The Inspired Word of God get in his way.

34 posted on 05/04/2008 11:54:45 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

35 posted on 05/04/2008 1:09:40 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Thanks for the post. I never would have guessed Luther was so hostile to various books of the Bible. Quite interesting. So much for sola scriptura!


36 posted on 05/04/2008 1:20:02 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Article of Faith 8 (”We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly”), the prophet declared, “I believe the Bible as it read when it came from the pen of the original writers. Ignorant translators, careless transcribers, or designing and corrupt priests have committed many errors” (History of the Church 6:57).

It took classical christianity a while to catch up, but they all say the same thing now.

37 posted on 05/04/2008 1:22:12 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: restornu

[It would be wrong to conclude that Martin Luther was a “Mormon” or that he saw everything the same way Joseph Smith did, but it is equally wrong to think that Luther’s beliefs and teachings were identical to those found among modern Evangelical Christians.]

Nice try Restornu. Luther was an intellectual, but also a down to earth man. He would have kicked Joseph Smith down the Street and into the River for the crap Joe was peddling, both intellectually and physically. Luther also wasn’t for bigamy, though he was forced to look aside at a ruler’s indiscretion.

Joseph Smith was a superstitious intellectual lightweight compared to Luther


38 posted on 05/04/2008 2:23:33 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote

Such a Telestial reply!


39 posted on 05/04/2008 2:37:35 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: restornu

youve not answered my question - why did you post this ?


40 posted on 05/04/2008 2:59:54 PM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson