Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conclusion from Peru and Mexico
email from Randall Easter | 25 January 2008 | Randall Easter

Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,661-4,6804,681-4,7004,701-4,720 ... 6,821-6,833 next last
To: kosta50; hosepipe; betty boop; Dr. Eckleburg
Thanks for your sermon.

You are quite welcome!

And you are not moral, I presume?

I presume you mean mortal.

In which case, the answer is not so much as some.

For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. – Colossians 3:3

As to quoting you, the quote was accurate and a great opportunity to praise God! Thank you for leaving the door open!

As to wave/particle duality - it stands as a great example of the observer problem. What the observer sees depends on the observation made.

So does the uncertainty principle, by the way, stand as a great example. The observer can know momentum or location but not both.

Man is not the measure of God.

For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For [as] the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. - Isaiah 55:8-9

To God be the glory!

4,681 posted on 03/31/2008 10:50:10 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4662 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
I guess I"m trying to say that if the best you can do and think leads someone to think we are wrong, then they must not seek to enter into closer union with us. But, I think, in so doing they, miss out on some good stuff. Of course, they think something similar about us. All I'm trying to do here is to develop the notion of imperiling the soul" Not to say, "We're right and you're not, nyah!"

That sounds fair enough to me, MD. It has been a pet theory of mine that even though AT LEAST one of our respective theologies is filled with problems, that God might nevertheless wish us to hold the beliefs that we do.

4,682 posted on 03/31/2008 11:34:59 PM PDT by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4408 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis; kosta50
FK, you really do need to reread On the Incarnation. The whole point of the Incarnation was so mankind could relate in a meaningful manner to "Ο ΩΝ" and thus have the ability to fulfill its created purpose. What Kosta has stated is completely patristic. Now, if in fact you accept the "Ancient of Days" image of The Father as the white bearded old man as being fully factual, then I can see how you could be shocked or dismayed at Kosta's remark, but he is expressing nothing that The Church hasn't always believed.

I just don't see how God can go from being impersonal to personal (Incarnation), presumably back to impersonal today. If God is impersonal there can be no meaningful relationship. Since I know I HAVE a meaningful relationship, this cannot be. Spiritually, I think we humans have an innate need for a meaningful relationship with something real. I think the Bible reveals that this relationship is to be between God and the believer. Do you agree that there is such a need, and if so how is it fulfilled in Orthodoxy?

A Blessed Pascha to you, FK.

Thank you brother. I wish you both a most Blessed Pascha for yours upcoming. :)

4,683 posted on 04/01/2008 12:40:46 AM PDT by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4413 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
As an aside: It is REALLY hard for me to imagine that anyone over the age of three has not been "tested". I think the Budhha was right that, in some respect, "life is suffering."

More generally star differs from star in glory, and I dare guess that saint differs from saint in kind and "amount" of sanctification.

(Just a wild conjecture, but it's suggested by Dante)

4,684 posted on 04/01/2008 3:59:57 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4676 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I presume you mean mortal. In which case, the answer is not so much as some.

LOLOL.

By the grace of God for His glory.

"For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.

For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's." -- Romans 14:7-8


4,685 posted on 04/01/2008 4:12:03 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4681 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; Manfred the Wonder Dawg; Alamo-Girl; Quix; the_conscience; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; ...
I think the Budhha was right that, in some respect, "life is suffering."

If we look at life as suffering, we will find suffering.

If we look at life as God's creation, eternally given to us in order to glorify His name forever, we will find joy among the thorns.

"And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose." -- Romans 8:28

WESTMINSTER SHORTER CATECHISM

Q. 1. What is the chief end of man?

A. Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.

Perhaps our different perspectives are again summed up by the RCC's use of the crucifix, while Bible-believing Christians prefer the victory of the empty cross. He has risen. We are saved. Christ is King.

"Happy is that people, that is in such a case: yea, happy is that people, whose God is the LORD." -- Psalm 144:15

4,686 posted on 04/01/2008 11:30:12 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4684 | View Replies]

To: Forest Keeper
I couldn't imagine spending my whole life going from saved to damned to saved to damned over and over again. I wouldn't leave the house. :)

It's another difference in emphasis , I guess. I'm not in the confessional, in the pew, before the Sacrament, saying my prayers, studying my Bible, writing checks to charities, restraining myself from reaching right down through the phone wires and strangling the solicitation-caller or (in the real world) being nice to him before I hang up in order, or WHATEVER in order to be saved or to skew the odds or because I'm worried about being saved, or because being saved, as such, is in my mind at all.

I also don't praise the sunset or the emerald spring grass to get on God's good side.

If I have a moment of doubt or a temptation, and as soon as I'm aware of it, I cross myself and mutter "In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." This is Catholic-speak for,"Take over, God, you have the conn."

Maybe, in terms of objective, so to speak, theology, I am just assuming that I am "saved". But, suppose I get angry and misbehave somehow. As soon as I "notice" I tell God that I know I did it and I'm sorry and ask for help to avoid messing up like that again AND I talk about it the next time I make a private confession. I just don't "worry" about being saved.

Okay: here's an image: Life is a war. I'm like a colonel. I'm doing my best to win and I'm doing my best with my troops. Sometimes I make a heck of a misjudgment -- could be for any number of reasons. That's terrible. Good soldiers died, and it's my fault -- terrible! MY failure led to horrible outcomes. BUT the war is not over. I have to take seriously how severe the mistake was, I have to understand it and to learn what I can to keep from doing it again. But I don't have time to indulge in a severe case of the dithers, to wring my hands, to get into a funk about whether this will cost us the war. It would be an even greater failure if I did do those things. So, instead, I turn back to the battle, resolved to do better next time.

I try, in the paradoxical way of working with Him who works in me both to will and to do, to hold up my end of the relationship -- which mostly means begin grateful for it.

It's the whole "hag-ridden" think again. Evidently some are hag-ridden and draw no comfort from their relationship with God. So far, since I "got" in 1971 that it was for me that He died, it has not been that way at all for me.

4,687 posted on 04/01/2008 11:33:56 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4679 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

“Bible-believing Christians prefer the victory of the empty cross. He has risen. We are saved. Christ is King.”

“Happy is that people, that is in such a case: yea, happy is that people, whose God is the LORD.” — Psalm 144:15

There ya go - tellin’ the secrets of the TRUTH. Aren’t you sposed to keep those things hidden?


4,688 posted on 04/01/2008 11:44:03 AM PDT by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4686 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

Impossible!


4,689 posted on 04/01/2008 12:03:20 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4688 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; Forest Keeper; Manfred the Wonder Dawg; Gamecock
I try, in the paradoxical way of working with Him who works in me both to will and to do, to hold up my end of the relationship

But that is not what the Scriptures say. Men feel a lot better and think more clearly if and when they actually read the words of God. By knowing the truth, the truth itself sustains us, as God intends.

"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure." -- Philippians 2:13

4,690 posted on 04/01/2008 12:08:45 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4687 | View Replies]

To: Forest Keeper
You'd better send two forms. I've been baptized twice. :)

God Bless you brother, me to! Don't say it too loud though, there was a time when people were killed for doing that. ;-0

4,691 posted on 04/01/2008 1:13:28 PM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4666 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Amen. Jn. 10:10.

10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.


4,692 posted on 04/01/2008 1:14:21 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4686 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Amen!

And what a beautiful passage to underscore the point! Thank you!

4,693 posted on 04/01/2008 1:43:30 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4685 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Indeed.

For as he thinketh in his heart, so [is] he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart [is] not with thee. - Proverbs 23:7

Thank you for sharing your insights and all those beautiful Scriptures!

4,694 posted on 04/01/2008 1:46:42 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4686 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Stand by for sarcasm (nothing personal):

It would have been great to have you me in the time from Xmas '74 to mid February '75 when we had two kids dying per week in the PICU.

"Hey people, The only reason you're feeling bad about losing your child is that you don't think properly. After all, Scripture says, '... as he thinketh in his heart, so he is.' So chin up. Your suffering at the loss of your child is just faithlessness."

Personally, I wouldn't have the nerve to try that on somebody in REAL pain.

But, for all that, it's not all entirely bad. We are obliged to conclude, I think, the Jesus was happy on the cross.

4,695 posted on 04/01/2008 3:32:08 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4694 | View Replies]

To: annalex; Forest Keeper
A quote from the Fathers is historical evidence of what the early Church believed.

I hope you don't mind me jumping in, but do you quote any of the Donatist's as well? I think their view of historical events and their causes might differ.

4,696 posted on 04/01/2008 3:45:25 PM PDT by wmfights (Believe - THE GOSPEL - and be saved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4667 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Oh Yeah, not to mention what I was supposed to say to the kids. "Hey, I'm sorry that your parents beat you so much that now you're dying, and I'm sorry that you can't talk or understand too much human speech. But, watch how you think, okay? If you think properly, you're not suffering."

Gosh, with a mesSage like this, I'd think that there'd be a lot of business in Darfur and Rwanda right now.

Y'all! You're not thinking right. So your baby's arm was cut off by some lunatic, so what? You're suffering is because you have the wrong world view. Now just sit down a minute and I'll explain the right world view to you, and your suffering will go away. Of course, you have to figure out how to explain it to your baby."

I think we might have to review our thinking on suffering. Should Jesus just have said to the ruler of the synagogue, "So your daughter's dying. But how are you thinking?" Why didn't the lady who touched the fringe of his garment just experience a sudden clarity of thought?

4,697 posted on 04/01/2008 3:45:28 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4695 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Forest Keeper
Since they were heretical, naturally I wouldn't quote them as expressing a belief of the Church, but quoting, for example St. Augustine debating them would indeed explain their heresy and the view taken by the Church.

See On Baptism, Against the Donatists.

4,698 posted on 04/01/2008 4:22:13 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4696 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Your post reminds me of Rev. Wurmbrand, a Lutheran Pastor, who spent 14 years in captivity, and whom Bishop Sheen called “my very good friend”. When beaten severely by his Communist tormentors, he was then given a mirror and his persecutors said to him: “Now—do you think you look like your Jesus?” And he responded: “Yes, now I do look like Him.”

I was privileged to meet Rev. Wurmbrand.

I also often think of Saul on the road to Damascus meeting Christ, Who said to him: “Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me?”

Paul was persecuting the new believers. Were they Christ that he was told he was persecuting? If we are told later by Paul (Saul) that “we are the Body of Christ member for member”, then there is a profund mystery here as regards human suffering under the “New and Eternal Covenant”.

Isn’t it Scripturally sound to understand that our human sufferings have eternal value and that “if we suffer with Him, we shall also reign with Him?”

If we allow Him to come into our hearts as He promised, (”My Father and I will come and make our abode in you”) then our sufferings, offered to us by His will and providence, have infinite value. They are not lost sufferings as would be the case of those who would curse because of what they suffer.

“Master, remember me when You come into your kingdom”.

“Amen, amen I say to you, this day you shall be with Me in Paradise.”


4,699 posted on 04/01/2008 4:29:50 PM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4697 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty; Mad Dawg
If we allow Him to come into our hearts as He promised, (”My Father and I will come and make our abode in you”) then our sufferings, offered to us by His will and providence, have infinite value. They are not lost sufferings as would be the case of those who would curse because of what they suffer.

Beautifully stated,thank you!

We should be willing to take on suffering,even ask Our Blessed Lord to allow us to suffer out of love for others who have strayed into heresies, fallen away and have wronged us.

This is true unconditional love in its purest form.

4,700 posted on 04/01/2008 5:47:20 PM PDT by stfassisi ("Above all gifts that Christ gives his beloved is that of overcoming self"St Francis Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4699 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 4,661-4,6804,681-4,7004,701-4,720 ... 6,821-6,833 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson