Posted on 01/27/2008 7:56:14 PM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg
I guess we do. Finished means perfect, complete. That includes the delivery of the true faith. The faith is delivered once from the lips of the Lord Himself. He said nothing of someone else picking up after Him. The same thing with Revelation. If Christ is the fullest revelation of God, why is there a "sequel?".
If all Christ did with His life was make it possible for us to save ourselves by doing enough works, then I consider it a cheap death
That's not what the Orthodox/Catholics believe. Our works are a reflection of our faith. We do works because, as you said yourself, God left us work to do. Being restored to the likeness of God is not accomplished with a magic wand.
The fullness of God's revelation could be expressed as Christ Himself, plus the Holy Spirit, plus the Scriptures, plus creation itself, and perhaps other things...
The NT, more precisely, the Gospels, are the narratives of God's revelation to man in His human nature. Without that, Christianity is meaningless because it would worship an unknown, distant deity which our human minds cannot conceive. In Christ, we can relate to God through His human nature, as use His humanity as our standard of what humans ought to be like.
The rest of the scriptures are either hints leading to the Gospels, or after-the-fact human interpretation and imitation of His teachings and life as witnessed by the Gospels. The book of Revelation is not even that. It's more like a de novo prophesy as if Christ did not fulfill the law and the prophets. It suggests that Christ did not reveal all that was to be revealed. And it flies in the face of the Great Commission that the Apostles are to teach what has been revealed, and not to invent or add to His revelation by some heavenly Internet "downloads."
Anyway, the full revelation of God is certainly more than one group of men's interpretation of the Gospels alone.
Yes, but nothing can top the Gospels.
Kosta: Ancient usage of quotes is not verbatim transcription of someone's utterances, but what the author believed that someone intended to say. This flies in the face of usage of quotes just as our terminology (coming from OT) is given Christianized meaning which differs from that in Judaism.
FK: That can't be. NT quotes of OT statements are VERBATIM.
Excuse me?!? And what evidence do you have that they are? Let me guess: the OT, right? LOL!
If you'd bother to look up the issue, you'll find that ancients did not quote verbatim but when they do quote "verbatim" they expressed what the author believed the person would have said. That is just a historical and literary fact and style.
It is satan who misquotes scripture, as he did when he lied to Eve about what God said
No one is talking about "misquoting" here, counsellor. I am saying that alleged quotes (which the Greeks and Jews don't use) are not verbatim quotes. In many instances, they simply can't be. Such as what Jesus said on the Cross. Except for John, all other Apostles were far away, hiding, to hear anything being said there. And please don't tell me the HS "told them." The get-out-of-all-dead-end-corners-about-the-Bible card. LOL!
Under what you are saying your reverence for the Gospels would have to be thrown out if all it amounts to is the "best efforts" to remember specific conversations from decades earlier. Nobody could do that in such detail (on his own).
Well, they copied from Mark, who was never there, and who heard it from Peter, who was hiding. That much is known. And they used the same source (narrative, oral tradition otherwise known as the "Q"), plus they added a little of their own personal twist to their concordance. John,on the other hand, writes 60 years after Christ and his Gospel doesn't resemble anything close to the other three.
That's not throwing out reverence for the Gospel; it's simply not making the Gospels what they are not. They are narratives according to their human authors, motivated moved by ("inspired:) by their faith. That doesn't mean they are perfect and free of human errors.
K:Yes, by all means, I agree. The key word is something. That could be a whole buffet of things.
Hey that's the first step. In the end though it is only the LORD who opens your eyes.
And how would you know who is elect or non-elect? If St. Thomas was a doubting Apostles (as all of them were), does that mean they wee not "elect?" How presumptuous!
Of a truth, self-defense is an instinctive reaction of man - e.g. to raise his arm when someone is about to strike a blow - or to return a blow, especially in the hope of making it stop.
It takes enormous Spiritual discipline to turn the other cheek - it requires living the Great Commandment, loving God surpassing above all else, putting His will above our instinctive self-defense.
Letting go and letting God.
I suspect that we all struggle with it:
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more [than others]? do not even the publicans so?
Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. - Matthew 5:38-48
It is not what we think or say or do but Whose we are, where we live, in Whom we abide. We are not perfect, He is.
There is only One Great Commandment.
To God be the glory!
It always goes back to works and uncertainty for the EO doesn't it.
***you must be referring to the outrageously extrapolated splinters from balsa wood toothpicks that the RC edifice has constructed so many skyscrapers on.***
Nope, I’m referring to the instructions given to us by Jesus.
God does not have a magic wand?...
When did this happen?..
He said let there be light... and there was..
He said let there be a man from mere dirt and there was..
He even said after being born you MUST be born again.. and some were..
He even spit on some dudes eyes and created eyeballs..
All from a magic wand.. now thats magicterial..
If you get my drift...
That's all? Nine billion dollars is pocket change in our federal budget. If that were true, we should have the wall built by now wihtout even feleing it. But beware that estimates ae just that, and are always less than true cost (that's how you get them approved, by making the look cheap).
The problem with walls is that they need maintenance. Unmaintained walls just become another unmaintained border. Holes appear in them and people slip in.
Cut of the demand created by unethical greedy businesses, by enfrcing the existing laws and depriving them on their illegitimate profits with fines, and the illegal imigration will not only stop but reverse itself. Once they can't find jobs, they will go back. No wall needed.
I like that portion about marvelous class. He sure has it, and He enables US to have it, too. Isn’t that wonderful?
I am always taking my Spiritual "vitals:"
If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us. - I John 1:5-10
Sometimes no matter how much proof there is right in front of people they just won't see it. The OJ Simpson jury is a perfect example of how people can ignore the truth because of underlying agendas.
All the evidence has been laid out from fulfillment of prophesy, witness statements, changed lives of Apostles and believers. I believe you are saying these things don't constitute proof because you enjoy debating.
Yes.. it is.. Thats one difference between Jesus' gospel and synthetic religion.. It has class...
Betty-boop, doubting someooene who pretends to be the mouthpiece of God is not judgment. Get the issue straight.
An Eastern Orthodox, an American Baptist (or a member of any other reformed confession), and a Roman Catholic are to my way of thinking and believing all members of the One Body of Christ
Spoken like a true Catholic, hey?
K:Last time I checked the Reformed did ther best to destroy Anabaptists.
Thank you for agreeing! It's rare. :-)
I wasn't pointing just at you guys. I would hope we recognize how wrong it was for any dominant Christian Church to persecute other Christians. We should evangelize and attempt to show where they have gotten off track.
If I am correctly understanding the ecumenical statements of the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, formerly Perfect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, and also his blessed predecessor, Pope John Paul II), then I think what I have spoken is "Catholic" in the truest sense of that word.
And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot. - Deuteronomy 29:2-5
Yet when Abraham took Isaac to be sacrificed he didn't actually kill him, but his faith was credited to him as righteousness.
I'm not sure how much they keep up with the writings of the Catholic Church or their dealings with Catholics on and off the forum.
But as far as I have kept up with the writings of the Catholic Church and knowing you as I do and the half of my family who are Catholic, I am convinced that what you have said is "Catholic" in the truest sense of the word.
The Septuagint says "It is a great thing for you to be called My servant, to establish the tribes of Jacob, and to recover the dispersion of Israel; behold, I have given you for the covenant of a race, for a light of the Gentiles, that you should be for salvation to the end of the earth."
The Gentiles are merely to receive the knowledge of the God of Abraham. It doesn't say anything about their salvation. The whole verse is about Israel the Jewish race.
The prophesy is in line with the concept of a Jewish messiah. The world will learn of the God of Abraham through him, because he will establish the rule of God over the entire earth. Through him the Jews will be saved "to the end of the earth."
Luke was probably Greek writing to Greeks using the Greek form of historical research and forms
He believed in Sheol (Luke 16), not in heaven, even though hie wrote his Gospel after the Resurrection. He believes that the righteous are carried by the angels into the bosom of Abraham. And the rich man is begging Abraham to reduce his torment. If he was Greek, he was probably a Greek-speaking Jew, or otherwise accepted what Paul told him as fact.
The only certainty we have is that we continue to sin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.