Posted on 10/24/2007 8:18:14 AM PDT by topcat54
And so it makes sense because you prefer and hold that pov?
Which pov?
Good question. Have you read Levinas?
A little. Is he right?
Everybody is right in part. I reckon you know that.
Systems are oppressive?
Duty to protect otherness is the prime objective?
Yes, systems can be oppressive. And a duty to protect otherness can be the prime objective.
“To be made in the image of God means not than one is God’s icon but that one finds oneself in his trace. The revealed God of our Judeo-Christian spirituality shows himself only in his trace. To approach [God] does not entail following this trace, which is not a sign. It means, instead, to approach the others [fellow human beings] who exist in the trace of this deity. Through this illeity, which has its place on the hither side of calculations and reciprocal relations of economy and world, being signifies. A meaning without finality that cannot be satiated by happiness.”
“In the other, there is a real presence of God. It is not a metaphor. It is not only extremely important, it is literally true. I am not saying that the other is God, but that in his or her face I hear the word of God.”
All transcendence and no incarnation?
The message that revelation is a trace is typical Levinas. You might find some passage which demeans the incarnation; to me these words are in another direction, confirming what St. Paul saw: “Christ in you, the hope of glory.” That is not to say you are God.
I understand that Levinas is not claiming that each of us is God but Levinas’ concept of the trace can hardly be compared to Paul’s conception of Christ in us. Per the Levinas quote I offered, his conception of the trace relates back to imago Dei which is something quite different from the Spirit of the incarnated Christ in us.
The question is does a exclusive concern for the other any less oppressive than exclusivism per se? I think clearly it is not. It reduces all truth claims to essentially the same thing to whatever the prevailing interpretative framework may be. It repressively reject the otherness of an exclusivist. It essentially retracts upon itself. We see this exact phenomenon with the political Left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.