Phony Mahony & the Homosexual Priest Cover-Up

American Vision ^ | 7/17/2007 | Gary DeMar

[Dr. Eckleburg]

ping to 120

[conservonator]

So that's a "yes" then is it?

Is this what the religion and god of Calvin leave with their disciples: a willingness to believe even the most vulgar and transparent lie as long as it denigrates the opposition? When you have to resort to using outright lies and polemics, as you have in three instances with in the last week, to support or advance your position, you may need to so some serious thinking and maybe a little praying.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

When you have to resort to using outright lies and polemics, as you have in three instances with in the last week...

Unless you can verify that statement, you're making personally slanderous comments...again.

But as we've seen so often on these threads, the RCC cannot recognize the lies in its grasp...

"He feedeth on ashes: a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?" -- Isaiah 44:20

[Petronski]

I’ve verified your unsupported claims and misstatements about my faith many times. It has no effect on you. You ignore it.

[Petronski]

We've been asked not to discuss it.

Actually, you've been instructed not to post it, because it is thoroughly debunked.

[Petronski]

That is an excellent homepage you have there.

[DarkSavant]

But as we've seen so often on these threads, the RCC cannot recognize the lies in its grasp..

Humorous given you just posted something from Foxe's Book of Martyrs, something not exactly knows for its scholarship.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

I've verified your unsupported claims and misstatements about my faith many times.

And again the proof of your vapid accusations is nowhere to be found.

The RCC is great at accusing others of wrong-doing while hiding under the gilded cloak of secrecy and denial.

As we've seen from this disgusting scandal in L.A., the RCC's only defense is "everyone is doing it" or "you victims are just complainers" or "there's nothing going on here."

Lessons learned, sadly.

[Petronski]

If you can't argue with the logic, trying just arguing with the premise:

Protestants don't have this problem . . .

[conservonator]

Again? Care to provide evidence, and keep in mind the precise definition of "slander".

As for your three transgressions, I give you 1) your intentional misreading of the Catechism regarding Muslims, and I must believe it is intentional since it your error was pointed out yet you refused to recant your position, 2) Your tacit belief in the pathetic Jesuit Oath, and finally 3) the grand polemic that is Fox's Book of Martyrs. 1,2,3...

How very sad.

[Petronski]

And again the proof of your vapid accusations is nowhere to be found.

That's your tactic: require proof, and when it is given, walk away and start elsewhere saying "hey, where's the proof?"

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Perhaps you should read "Fox's Book of Martyrs" for some insight into the well-documented blood-lust of the RCC.

But thanks for the opportunity to post the classic again.

FOX'S BOOK OF MARTYRS

[conservonator]

I’ve found that the K.I.S.S principle works in just about every aspect of my life ;)

[Petronski]

If The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were an anti-Catholic fraud rather than an anti-Semitic fraud, I do believe it would be quoted next.

[Petronski]

Please keep connecting yourself to it. In doing so, you only serve to self-indict.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

1) your intentional misreading of the Catechism regarding Muslims, and I must believe it is intentional since it your error was pointed out yet you refused to recant your position, 2) Your tacit belief in the pathetic Jesuit Oath, and finally 3) the grand polemic that is Fox's Book of Martyrs. 1,2,3...

LOL.

1) The RCC's embrace of the Muslims is well-documented in both the RCC catechism and in JPII's loving lips smooching the Koran.

2) We were asked not to discuss the Jesuit Oath yet you keep bringing it up. You must be awfully familiar with it. Do you deny Jesuits take an oath?

3) "Fox's Book of Martyrs" is a Christian classic. It's read by Presbyterians, Methodists, Anglicans, Lutherans, Congregationalists, etc.

Granted, the RCC is made uncomfortable by a retelling of the Vatican's shameful, blood-soaked history. But that's not my problem. It's yours.

Thank God.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

If you fellows wish to keep up this slander-fest, it may be because you find this thread so distasteful that you want it pulled.

You'll have to accomplish that without me.

[Petronski]

Do you deny Jesuits take an oath?

The more important quesiton is: do YOU claim Jesuits take THAT oath?

[Petronski]

You’ve demonstrated no slander, except those you offer against the Catholic Church. Running away might be your best choice at this point.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

the K.I.S.S principle works in just about every aspect of my life

You're right. That's pretty simple.