Skip to comments.
Thank God For the Magisterium
NCR ^
| June 10, 2007
| Mark Shea
Posted on 06/10/2007 3:02:20 PM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 761-767 next last
To: Petronski
lol. As is so often the case, the RCC instructs us not to believe in the written word, but in what men say about the written word.
301
posted on
06/13/2007 1:18:26 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Petronski
302
posted on
06/13/2007 1:19:18 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Petronski
And changing the font to blue does not change what the words say in black and white.
303
posted on
06/13/2007 1:20:55 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
As is so often the case, the RCC instructs us not to believe in the written word, but in what men say about the written word. You have presented another false statement about Roman Catholic Church teaching. (Are you trying to set a record?) It's quite the opposite. We're called to believe what the Bible teaches us, not the private personal interpretation of scripture offered by some stranger on the internet.
304
posted on
06/13/2007 1:22:01 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
According to Scripture.As you choose to interpret it.
305
posted on
06/13/2007 1:22:28 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Pardon me. I was led to believe (by one of your fellow travelers) that bold italic blue text was somehow more credible or true.
Is that not the case?
306
posted on
06/13/2007 1:23:58 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Petronski
I try to speak only for myself.
307
posted on
06/13/2007 1:27:49 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
I try to speak only for myself.I've noticed otherwise.
308
posted on
06/13/2007 1:31:14 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Not at all. That is a misrepresentation of our respect and love for Mary.
309
posted on
06/13/2007 1:34:42 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Petronski
DING DING DING!!! WE HAVE A YOPIOS WINNER!!!The YOPIOS rule is officially triggered. Petronski loses any debate, and is hereby chastised for invoking a false defense that precludes any rational response.
YOPIOS is disingenuous and arbitrary.
310
posted on
06/13/2007 1:48:07 PM PDT
by
pjr12345
(You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone - James 2:24)
To: pjr12345
That’s the post that marks your surrender.
You get so sore when you’re forced to recognize that your interpretation of scripture is NOT final.
311
posted on
06/13/2007 1:52:18 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Petronski
Once YOPIOS is invoked, the invoker has run the course of rational debate. His defense becomes, in the words of Pee Wee Herman, “I know you are, but what am I?!” That is, he sets up a defense that is insurmountable with rationality. From that moment on, the YOPIOS defender can claim that “it’s just your interpretation.”
The reality is that ALL interpretation of Scripture is YOPIOS, including that sanctioned by the RCC.
What’s next with the YOPIOS defense? Will you invoke it if I claim that John 11:35 means that Jesus shed tears? Where is it not (in)valid?
Nope, any invocation of YOPIOS must be taken as a concession of the debate.
312
posted on
06/13/2007 2:00:22 PM PDT
by
pjr12345
(You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone - James 2:24)
To: pjr12345; Petronski
What a shame that this thread has taken this turn.
313
posted on
06/13/2007 2:17:51 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: NYer
Perhaps as thread host you can do something to salvage this. :)
314
posted on
06/13/2007 2:18:56 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: NYer
I would have referred to you as the thread hostess, but then you'd have to wear this:
315
posted on
06/13/2007 2:22:02 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Petronski
As you choose to interpret it. When the word of God is contradicted as boldly as it is in the RCC regarding the fiction that surrounds Mary, it's not too difficult to understand.
"Therefore shall evil come upon thee; thou shalt not know from whence it riseth: and mischief shall fall upon thee; thou shalt not be able to put it off: and desolation shall come upon thee suddenly, which thou shalt not know. Stand now with thine enchantments, and with the multitude of thy sorceries, wherein thou hast laboured from thy youth; if so be thou shalt be able to profit, if so be thou mayest prevail." -- Isaiah 47_11-12
"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" -- 1 Timothy 2:5
316
posted on
06/13/2007 2:22:26 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Petronski
I try to speak only for myself. I've noticed otherwise.
If all you've got is a nonsensical turn of phrase, then that's all you've got.
317
posted on
06/13/2007 2:25:19 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Petronski
We're called to believe what the Bible teaches us Praise God. Then believe it.
""For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" -- 1 Timothy 2:5
"Be not afraid; only believe." -- Mark 5:36
318
posted on
06/13/2007 2:29:57 PM PDT
by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
When the word of God is contradicted as boldly as it is in the RCC regarding the fiction that surrounds Mary, it's not too difficult to understand.You're entitled to interpret the Bible however you wish.
319
posted on
06/13/2007 2:36:50 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
We're called to believe what the Bible teaches us...Ah, you're editing my words to twist their meaning again. Here's the whole thing (the part in bold refers to YOUR posts):
We're called to believe what the Bible teaches us, not the private personal interpretation of scripture offered by some stranger on the internet.
320
posted on
06/13/2007 2:39:29 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 761-767 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson