Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin on the Right: Why Christians and conservatives should accept evolution
Scientific American ^ | October 2006 issue | Michael Shermer

Posted on 09/18/2006 1:51:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Dimensio

Signing off for now. And have very little desire to reply to your posts. Try a search engine for 'Equidistant Letter Spacing in the Torah' (1st 5 books of the Bible) and let's see you disprove the ELS codes.

Or maybe prove that Psalm 22 was not written hundreds of years before Jesus Christ and that God did not fulfill all of these prophecies regarding the death of His Son on the cross.


301 posted on 09/19/2006 11:16:04 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Signing off for now. And have very little desire to reply to your posts.

Why? Are you frustrated by requests for you to substantiate your unsupported claims?

Try a search engine for 'Equidistant Letter Spacing in the Torah' (1st 5 books of the Bible) and let's see you disprove the ELS codes.

There is no need. Others have already thoroughly debunked the "Bible Codes" previously.

Or maybe prove that Psalm 22 was not written hundreds of years before Jesus Christ and that God did not fulfill all of these prophecies regarding the death of His Son on the cross.

What evidence have you that these "prophecies" were actually fulfilled?
302 posted on 09/19/2006 11:19:34 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Not exactly. Our rights are divinely ordained - a reference to God - not judicially ordained.

Really? Wow. And here I thought we were a nation of laws, and secular laws at that. Perhaps you can provide a reference to the "divine ordinance" that is embodied in, oh, say, the 1st amendement, or the commerce clause, or Section 7 -- just for starters.

303 posted on 09/19/2006 11:20:39 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Your rights and my rights were declared by christians to be ordained by God ...

The specific term is "Creator." This does not necessarily imply a god, or even specifically the Christian God. The founders were very specific in their word choices; does it not strike you as odd that "God" is not specifically mentioned?

304 posted on 09/19/2006 11:21:42 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio; BrandtMichaels
Prophesies can be spoofed in any number of ways:

  1. The "prophesy" could've been written after the event and backdated to cover it
  2. The "prophesy" could be vague enough to cover any number of events (the Book of Revelation comes to mind...)
  3. The events in question are completely fictitious as is the prophesy said to cover them

305 posted on 09/19/2006 11:27:19 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

I have no idea what phantom you are responding to. I have not defended government schools.

But government schools teach many things that contradict a literal reading of the Bible. The earth moves. Pi does not equal three. Bats are not birds. Grasshoppers have more than four legs. The sun does not orbit the earth.


306 posted on 09/19/2006 11:34:27 AM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Junior

I thought that many of the founders were Deists.


307 posted on 09/19/2006 11:43:20 AM PDT by Dante Alighieri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer
Can any Christian who believes in evolution please explain one thing to me...at what point between apes and humans did God decide to give humans a soul? Was it a specific generation, ie. a mother and father weren't given souls, but their children were? Or did the soul evolve along with the ape-men?

Still waiting...

At what point in time did God deprive apes of souls? Why did he do so? Sadistic amusement, sort of like kids pulling wings off flies?

308 posted on 09/19/2006 12:12:25 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

http://www.direct.ca/trinity/codebreaker.html


309 posted on 09/19/2006 12:18:25 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909; Doctor Stochastic

Thank you. To be honest, I believe I have been bested by ol' Doc Stoc. (In post 211 to this thread).


310 posted on 09/19/2006 12:18:25 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs; Doctor Stochastic
You are correct. He gets a Big Pun award too.


311 posted on 09/19/2006 12:22:32 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Dante Alighieri

That is my understanding, though there appears to be some controversy over that.


312 posted on 09/19/2006 12:38:26 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Thalos; Junior

From your link, Thalos:

"Also, we must be aware that it is modern science that has a different classification system than ancient times. To the ancients, creatures such as a bat were considered birds since they categorized all flying animals as birds. If that is the category that they used, then they were correct. It is not an error. It is a difference of categorization procedures. The critic has imposed upon the ancient text a modern system of categorization and then said that the Bible is wrong."

What part of this explanation do you disagree with? Are you saying modern taxonomy is your basis for disagreeing with the Bible? I would call that a pretty weak, unsupportable argument.

The same site discusses rabbits.

Locusts: Perhaps the hind legs (hoppers) were not counted in the description. From a current web site (http://www.geocities.com/brisbane_insects/ScientificInsect.htm):

"There are great variations on insect legs. Cockroaches have three pair of strong legs and they run very fast. Grasshoppers have their last pair of legs modified and they can jump to start a fright quickly. Praying mantids have their front pair of legs like a weapon to catch prey. Dragonflies do not use their legs to walk but to capture insects and hold them under their mouths. Butterflies use their legs to taste the food. Besides, insect legs are also used for digging and swimming."

Note:

from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthoptera

Taxonomy note
Note that the cricket suborder Ensifera will probably be given its own order soon, the Grylloptera. The Orthopterists' Society also recently (December 2005) decided upon a major change in the classificatory organization of the Ensifera.


313 posted on 09/19/2006 12:40:21 PM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

So what absolute minimum amount of time is required for the present day status of mankind to reach its current genetic diversity from 8 already diversified individuals?


314 posted on 09/19/2006 12:43:05 PM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Thatcherite

Thanks for your direct answer. I do believe the Bible is divine revelation. I am also aware of the dispute in Christian circles over evolution.

It has been nice "talking to you."


315 posted on 09/19/2006 12:45:54 PM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: atlaw

I believe God made the present universe without any pre-existent materials.

I also believe He destroyed mankind, excepting 8 individuals, with a universal flood. I am not discounting supernaturalism in the flood.

Jesus and other New Testament writes referred to Noah, the flood, and the eight survivors.

As far as comic books, I have seen some pretty sketchy evolution drawings, including some on this thread. I have also seen some very professional, highly polished depictions, in print and film, of what happened in the past ages, millions of years ago, that are nothing but total fabrication from pure speculation, but presented as fact in the name of science.


316 posted on 09/19/2006 12:54:06 PM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: srweaver
So what absolute minimum amount of time is required for the present day status of mankind to reach its current genetic diversity from 8 already diversified individuals?

A human population genetic bottleneck may have occurred 70,000 years ago or so and bottomed out at 10,000 or more individuals.

The current level of diversity in humans and animals could not have happened in a few thousand years.

317 posted on 09/19/2006 12:54:08 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

Comment #318 Removed by Moderator

To: srweaver
To the ancients, creatures such as a bat were considered birds since they categorized all flying animals as birds.

Indeed. These are the kinds of errors you would expect from cultures of that time -- but not from God.

319 posted on 09/19/2006 1:05:39 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Indeed. These are the kinds of errors you would expect from cultures of that time -- but not from God.

Taxononmy is classification. It by definition cannot be error because it is subjective. While one could say that our system is much more precise than the ancients, one must never confuse accuracy and precision, especially in situations where, as here, the issue is one of inherent definitions.

320 posted on 09/19/2006 1:09:34 PM PDT by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson